@PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • edit-22 months agoFounding Party rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1446arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1446arrow-down1imageFounding Party rulelemmy.world@PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish • edit-22 months agomessage-square57fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekamenLady.linkfedilink6•2 months ago55 attendees - i would assume these 55 plus their aides.
minus-square@Dagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilink8•2 months agoThat’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been. I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.
55 attendees - i would assume these 55 plus their aides.
That’s my assumption as well, but I don’t know what the protocol for this type of affair would have been.
I was also thinking that there might also have been ‘female companionship’ provided.