Cross-posted to !sciencefiction@lemmy.world

It is not possible to read all the Sci-Fi books out there. So you must have a process for selecting what you do read. Reading a book is an investment in your time. Your time is valuable. No one wants to waste that time reading unworthy books.

I have never codified my criteria. And it has changed and evolved over time. I suspect it will continue to change moving forward, as who I am tomorrow is not who I was yesterday.

What is your criteria to date?

Mine is that it must meet ALL the following criteria, some objective and some subjective.

  • it must have at least 1,000 reviews
  • it must have at least 70% 5-star reviews
  • if after reading about it I get the suspicion that it’s a romance disguised as Sci-Fi, I automatically reject it no matter what
  • if it’s YA, it really needs to be exceedingly compelling to choose it
  • Space Opera also needs to be exceedingly compelling
  • if I get the feeling it’s trying to preach I’ll reject it
  • if i get the feeling it has (messaging, strong opinions, or political overtones) about today’s societal issues, I probably won’t choose it. Not judging; I primarily read for escapism.

I guess that’s about it. There’s probably more but I just haven’t put that much thought into it yet.

I’m very interested in how y’all decide to choose a book to spend your valuable time reading.

  • dresdenM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Out of these I have only read The Stand, and I thought it would have been a great book if it was 2/3rd of the total length 😀 .

    I actually read King when I was pretty young, it’s possible I would like him when I read him now. I have heard of It and have been thinking of getting it, but will add rest of the books to the list too, and get whichever one or two I can easily find.

    Thanks for the recommendations.

    • nieceandtows@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason I didn’t like the last third of the book was that the concept of the virus itself was enough horror, and the first third of the book is the most relatable horror especially after covid. There was no reason or place for a supernatural horror. That aspect ruined the flow for me.

      • dresdenM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I guess that makes sense. Though when I read it long time ago, when there was no sign of Covid, it might be interesting to read it now.