stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoSan Francisco bakery sparks debate by refusing to serve armed policewww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1668arrow-down120file-textcross-posted to: news@kbin.social
arrow-up1648arrow-down1external-linkSan Francisco bakery sparks debate by refusing to serve armed policewww.independent.co.ukstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square194fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@kbin.social
minus-squareNougat@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up237arrow-down1·1 year agoPrivate business, police are not a protected class, the end.
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoIdk gives me some costume ideas tho. Introducing: SUPERCOP
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThat would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.
Private business, police are not a protected class, the end.
Don’t give them ideas
Idk gives me some costume ideas tho.
Introducing: SUPERCOP
That would blow up in their face at this point. None of them want a challenge to section 1983 now that we know the full text of the law. It would strip them if qualified immunity.