• baked_tea
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless they sort out their funding (find someone that is not Google for majority of their money), people shouldn’t care.

      • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand. You think people shouldn’t care about privacy? You think people shouldn’t care about one or two massive corporations having complete control over the internet?

        Explain.

        • baked_tea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not at all. They should find an alternative that cannot be just unplugged on demand.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Mozilla cannot be unplugged on demand. That would cause Google to become a monopoly, and they would be held to extreme harsh laws by the EU. Like in the case of IE6 back in the day.

            Google does not want that, so they donate to Mozilla to keep Firefox as a competitor. And Firefox has to do jack shit in return other than exist.

            The only way Firefox could be unplugged is if a new non-chromium browser becomes one of the big browsers.

            • baked_tea
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is all technically correct. Although I think it’s a little naive to say that a corporation “cannot” do something today. There are lots of things they technically cannot do yet it happens on daily basis.