What’d y’all think of the debate?

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The statement is true, per the specifications I allowed. I never indicated any value assessment as you focused on. That’s not the point

      Edit, to address the goalpost move: as a DA she certainly would have been in charge of staffing an office and had many humans in jobs. More than zero. So that’s not true

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Her office would have designated the need for positions and filled them. They would have had a budget and worked within it to staff.

          Another goalpost move on p/l.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              My original involvement was to fact check the bankruptcy claim, not discuss the value or issues with bankruptcy. The goal posts were moved to bring up Harris being a long time government employee. I spent replies discussing how.the differences are largely semantic, but that’s literally besides my original point, and you are free to have your opinion on government work, because it’s not what I’m here for anyway.

              Trump, as leader of his businesses, DID file bankruptcies, as the article describes.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Facts indeed. I provided a source of the bankruptcies for companies that he was the leader of, as I specified.

                  Edit Any discussion of the consequences of those bankruptcies or the validity of candidates based on their business background is outside of the scope, and a goalpost move.