For me, it was that the Internet never forgets and that you should never enter your real name. In my opinion, both of these rules are now completely ignored.

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The same people who warned us about the dangers of the internet and not to believe everything, are now the ones readily falling for and spreading conspiracies and lies from social media.

    It’s tragic.

    • solarvector@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      I suspect now it was never about “don’t believe everything”, it’s just been “believe what I believe”. Which I suppose follows Nietzsche’s thought on the transition from religion to ideology.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Don’t believe everything you see. Actually I was taught that about TV, but for some reason the old folks forgot about it being applicable everywhere in life, not just on TV. They also forget about it on TV too.

  • distortwave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    5 days ago

    Don’t share your personal information online.

    Yeah that’s definitely not being followed anymore.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        The modem made noises when connecting, but if someone picked up the phone, your internet would just stop working and they’d get their dial tone.

        Now dot matrix printers, those were real pterodactyl sounds.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Modems can still make noise. As recently as five years ago I still had to work with modems. A lot of them now have silent mode though

        • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Modems also make noises when connected. However, the noise of them connecting is more distinctive because they go through a handshake where you can hear distinct tones, but then negotiate a higher baud rate involving modulation of many different frequencies, at which point to the human ear it is indistinguishable from white noise (a sort of loud hissing). If you pick up the phone while the modem is connected at a higher baud rate (post the handshake), you’ll hear the hissing, and then eventually you picking up the phone will have caused too many errors for the connection to be sustained (due to introducing noise on the line), causing both ends to hang up. You’ll then hear the normal tone you hear when the called party has hung up the line.

          • toynbee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Decades ago, I saw a (one of many) "you might be a geek / nerd if … " list (referencing “you might be a redneck”). As of this moment, the only one I remember is “you leave the modem speaker on after connecting because you think it sounds like the ocean - the perfect sound for surfing the web!”

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      You come from a nice family. My family disconnected each other all the time

    • n0x0n@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That, together with: I’m online, watch out for the ca… “No carrier”

    • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I used to get hella annoyed that my mom would be online all afternoon so I would pick up the phone and blow into it for a few seconds until I heard AOL man say “Goodbye.”

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Don’t feed the trolls.

    Of course nowadays its nearly impossible to tell whos spouting racial slurs to get folks mad and whos doing it because they’re just an asshole.

    • Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Just assume almost everybody is an asshole online and you can’t be wrong. Because anonymity has granted them that capability.

      • Localhorst86@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 days ago

        The fact that people being assholes with their real names on Facebook tells me, anonymity has nothing to do with it.

        • Pyflixia@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Facebook has no anonymity though. So it’s different. You are sole responsible for who you allow yourself to add that now may know your real name.

          I think people being assholes on FB with their real names makes filtering a hell of a lot easier.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I remember when it was just funny edgy humor that was clearly satirical for the most part because a lot of us were just dumb kids. It was abrasive and stupid but you had this feeling everyone was in on the joke.

      But bizarre satire has turned to deeply held conviction.

      I’m not just sad that the mean spirited trolling persists, but that it’s gotten more sincere and often must be taken seriously. :(

  • rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bottom-posting eMails and Usenet posts.

    Fuck you, Microsoft. Bottom-posting replies is the correct way to reply.

    • n0x0n@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      German here, I remember teaching people email etiquette and reminding them: “No TOFU” (Text Oben, Full quote Unten).

      Means sth like “text above, full quote below”

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Quote above, reply below was the eMail and Usenet standard from the 70s until Microsoft introduced Outlook, and more importantly, bundled Outlook Express with Windows in the mid to late 90s. Those were the first products that automatically top-posted by default, and especially on Usenet, you could almost always correctly identify an Outlook Express n00b by virtue of them top-posting.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.” -Abraham Lincoln

    Social media, a gorilla getting shot, two US elections, and GenAI later, we have completely fallen off this one simple rule.

  • Jordan117@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    When you share something cool, link back to the original creator or where you found it from.

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’d argue this is the opposite of what was asked.

      In the early days, no one would post sources or attribute “stuff” to anyone. We’d all just share what we thought were cool pictures.

      Now, everyone gets mad when you dont post the name of the artist and their socials.

      • Jordan117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        This might be more of a blogosphere-era thing I guess. Even when most people blogging did it for pleasure rather than work, it was always considered polite to “hat tip” (h/t) the source of a given link, if you happened to find it on someone else’s site.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        What people are really mad about us the fact that artists are (and always have been) starving. We throw so much food away, let the artists cook for fucks sake.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I would posit a big part of this is because early-net days were primarily for just socializing and sharing cool stuff (heck yeah, I miss it.) Artists probably didn’t make a majority of their living through the 'net. If something was shared it was likely just “I think this is cool, folks!”

        Nowadays, to say the Internet is heavily commercialized would be a massive understatement. Every little interaction is monetized. Many people make their entire living through e-commerce. It’s just how things went.

        Meanwhile you have a billion faceless sandfleas with repost-botfarms trying to hustle cash with the stupidest methods possible.

        You’ll see entire channels where animations or paintings or whatever are circulated on socials like youtube, twitter, or tiktok with the artist tag conveniently cropped out (if there was one).

        Some are outright stealing the work for profit (selling tshirts or something), while others are just using it to farm clicks, which is also a route to profit.

        The artist who made the work is cheated, perhaps unaware, as some click-grifter gets all the attention. And that sucks. :( As an artist myself, I try to make sure I share the sources for stuff now, because recognition is a form of thanks, at the very least.

        I miss the sharing internet…the attention economy has basically turned the internet into a sociological illustration of “The paperclip apocalypse”. :(