• Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s why I only use inside cameras, eg dumb cameras where I can ensure that they are only accessible inside my LAN.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally any dumb webcam and a Raspberry Pi or similar will do. I used a webcam and an old laptop. But I never put up full time surveillance. Just spontaneously when I needed something.

        Heard Ubiquiti was good.

          • Taleya@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s the problem(same with automation. ) You have your own infrastructure- $$ but secure - or you have the backen offsourced to a remote server for a cheaper device and get data raped.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where would be a good place to ask for advice about setting these things up? It’s not something I want to start looking in to quite yet but once I move in a few months I’d really like to set something up and I know I’m going to need some advice…

      • toynbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe that Reolink cameras plus an NVR allow, but don’t require, completely offline recording.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There aren’t any. The best you can do is accept that they’re compromised and firewall them off from everything except the NVR they’re supposed to talk to. Put the whole camera network on a separate VLAN with no gateway.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t have any security cameras, but unless you have a whole bunch of computers at home, a LAN is what, 3 maybe 4 machines? In my case, it’s a desktop machine, two notebooks and an iPad. Those could easily all be stolen by the person who breaks into the house with the cameras.

      I don’t know what the solution here is because I sure wouldn’t trust the Internet as the solution.

      • KIM_JONG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A LAN could be zero machines. Point is IP addresses are not routable on the public internet.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not really the point. The footage from the camera has to be stored somewhere. Either locally or remotely. If it’s remote, there’s a chance of it leaking. If it’s local, the machine it’s on could get stolen. So again, I don’t know what the solution is.

          • KIM_JONG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was just being a pedant about your definition of LAN. :)

            For a non-pedantic definition, yours is fine.

          • JonEFive@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re worried about physical theft then you’ll want to enable encryption on the storage drives.