Now that we have final numbers. It appears that Harris had all the white & black support she needed for an EC victory. But Trump outright flipping Latino men and making huge gains with Latino women seems to have made all the difference.

What do you think?

First image is 2024, second is 2020.

  • 1uname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    what’s the source of the ‘final numbers’ because they do not agree with what i have been able to find? and how can they be final when no one knows how any individual voted?

  • sith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Kamala lost because the policies of the Democrats suck for working class people. And the Democrats are in general corrupt as fuck. It’s as simple as that. Just as in Russia, if the system is super corrupt, better make it explicit by making corruption THE system. USA has been an oligarchy for quite some time. Trump 2.0 just made it explicit.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trump literally laughed about Union busting with Elon in front of millions on a Twitter space.

      No republicans voted to extend the child tax credit this year.

      Republicans tried to kill union pensions, Dems saved it with their slim majority.

      Joe Biden did the Chips Act, saving and creating over 800k jobs from being shipped overseas.

      Republicans are the ones in favor of Right to Work.

      Joe Biden at his old age literally marched on the picket line with union workers.

      Seriously, I mean this with no disrespect. What the fuck are you talking about?

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    After Donald Trump called every stripe of Latino, rapists and murderers, publicly, often and loudly, More Latinos voted for Donald Trump in this past election than have ever voted for any Republican candidate in any American election ever. Spin it any way you like.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I used to joke that America is a terrible place, full of narcisists, liars, and assholes.

      Trump isn’t the cause of this. He’s just exposed how much those jokes are based on reality, and are no longer jokes.

      He’s brought to the forefront our worst qualities, and confirmed the fact that no matter how much progress America has made, we’re all still just a bunch of racists and assholes. And this time it’s not a joke. It’s confirmed.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It appears that’s what won him the election. Yes turnout was down, but the demo percentages from 2020 to 2024 are not that much different outside of Latino voters.

      And I must ask? How did Trump pull this off? And would Kamala have won without the Latino rightward shift?

      • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        10 days ago

        Donald Trump doubled (+100%) the black vote he received in 2020. Across the board minorities saw change in putting Trump back in the big seat, as apposed to the disaster he will bring to them, and their families. People went through the pandemic, only to be hit with what’s felt like the largest peacetime inflation, which was not handled by the Biden administration. Normal people don’t care about economic numbers when their paying 30-50% more for milk, eggs, bread, and rent. When faced with more of the same with no real enumerated plan to get better, and back patting, they voted for different, come what may. You know which minority group didn’t break right, Jews (+5% 3.5% being the margin of error).

        • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Trump gained 2% of black men, and lost 2% of black women. He made virtually no gains with black voters.

          He gained literally 1% of them. I don’t know where this narrative of trump making massive gains with black people is coming from. All the data suggest at best, a very small gain from 2020 compared to the enormous gains he received with Latinos.

        • socsa@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Biden handled Trump’s inflation expertly though. Everyone in 2021 said we would go through a recession, and we got a soft landing instead. And groceries are not 30% more expensive. They are around 15% above 2019 prices, not even that far out from historical inflation rates.

          Trump won because of economic gaslighting and you and half the people on the internet still repeat these lies.

        • The2b@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          “which was not handled by the Biden administration”

          This is just plainly false. The Biden administration handled the global inflation crisis better than any other G7 country in the world. Not only did we have the lowest rate of inflation across the G7 countries, ours ended sooner than any of them as well.

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        It appears that’s what won him the election

        There’s hundreds of “what if” imagined scenario’s that would end up with a different result.

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      People keep claiming this without any context. He said a subset of those who enter illegally are the worst Mexico can throw at us. He never claimed all Latinos. This is hyperbole on repeat, and the left wonders why the right ignores everything they say about Trump.

      It’s basically frustration based propaganda at this point. Don’t know if you recognize it.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” - Dementia Felon trump

        I guess it’s OK what he said because, hey, they aren’t all bad…

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think white men and white women bear more of the blame here purely by population size.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Agreed. Despite all the nuances (which are important, too)… Judging by this table, the biggest total blame is on white men, followed by white women and latino men, though there aren’t that many of them. But I feel i need to say this doesn’t have anything to do with ethnicity. You could also make a chart of city vs rural areas or several other factors and you’d probably also find interesting correlations and shifts in opinion.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Latines now make up 20% of the U.S. population, making them the largest minority group. Among the under-18 demographic, that number climbs to nearly 30%. If current population trends hold, Latines are poised to become the largest ethnic group in the country within about 25 years—that’s just three presidential terms away.

        While Latines are a minority ethnicity, they are the largest one and the second-fastest growing, trailing only Asians. Asians, despite having one of the lowest birth rates, experience the highest proportional rate of immigration. Notably, Trump gained 12% of the Asian vote in the most recent election, a trend across these growing demographics that, if sustained, could spell significant gains for Republicans in the future.

        However, let’s not overlook the broader electoral picture. Black, Asian, and Latine men and women combined make up about 29% of the voting public in presidential elections, while white women alone account for a staggering 37-38%. For context, Latino men represent just 5-6% of voters. White women are, by far, the largest voting demographic.

        Interestingly, Trump increased his share of all women by 7% compared to when he ran against Biden and has increased his support from women each time he’s ran. The devastating thing, I think, is that Trump won 13% more of the 18-29-year-olds, 5% more of 30-44-year-olds, and continues to capture “Boomer Lite,” aka Gen X, a majority of whom he has won each time he’s ran, but he increased his share by 9% this time.

        Edit: corrected an earlier data error.

        • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Dude where are you getting your data? Trump won white women by 52% in 2016.

          If he had lost white women like you posted, he would’ve lost the election.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Hmm. An article quoting Pew: “a majority of white women (53 percent) did vote for Trump in the 2024 presidential election, up from 44 percent in 2020 and 39 percent in 2016 per Pew.”

            but I think you’re right, those numbers sound like all women. I’ll edit the post.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      With how thin our election margins are, I wonder if literally just misogynists can swing the election. Would 1 in 100 Americans refuse to vote for a woman for president? I think maybe yes.

      • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        It’s hard to separate out the factors. Would a man have also struggled with a campaign starting so late (and doing so poorly in a previous primary). Would a white women? How can we separate out the influence of race, sex and the less than ideal running circumstances.

        Given who she is, and running when she had to, she actually did pretty damn well.

        Tbh looking for blame beyond Biden seems pointless to me. She has every sign of having been able to win over more people had she been prepped as the nominee from the start…

      • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        15 million of them. That is a staggering number.

        It’s also not an accurate number. The official count for Biden in 2020 was about 81.3 million (found many places online, but the official one is a good choice) and the unofficial count for Harris by AP so far is about 74.3 million. That’s about 7 million, which is less than half of what you claimed.

        People have got to stop just posting straight up false information. If you don’t know, don’t post.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 days ago

            No, if you said it a week ago it would be outdated. The fact that you’re still saying it is what makes it false. As you point it out new information is available. You’re just using old information still.

            By comparison if I wrote a book in the 1600s about the medical necessity of leaching, that would be outdated today. If I wrote a book about the medical necessity of leaching in 2024 that would just be false.

            • Bilb!@lem.monster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              But they still use leeches! Because your hypothetical example is imperfect I’m afraid I’ll have to dismiss everything you said and go with the old, inaccurate numbers. What a shame.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              9 days ago

              I didn’t write a book or claim to be an authority on the subject. I stated what I remember on a subject I had read an article about 2 weeks ago.

          • would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            We both know the reasonable way to interpret your post, and the way nearly everybody would interpret it, is that that’s the current or final count. It’s also outdated to say 74 million fewer people voted for Harris, but at one point, that was in fact the count. But it’s more than outdated - it’s misleading to the point of being factually inaccurate to any observer.

            I can’t believe instead of being like “oh shit, I made a mistake, my bad, I better think for a second about this in the future” you’re going to try to justify it. Whatever, that’s social media at this point I guess. Surely I’m not the problem, says everybody feeding misinformation in a giant circle. I thought Lemmy might be better, but it’s just not. Thank you for convincing me to finally give all social media up.

            • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              I didn’t know it was outdated at the time. I don’t constantly check and double things I read in passing to see if it has been updated. I am not a professional in the field.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 days ago

    Need some titles on those columns. I’m guessing red/blue are the usual party colors, but what is the 3rd?

    The biggest factor really is disengagement. There where millions who where involved in 2020 that just skipped out this time.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    “Are we out of touch with our core voters?”

    “No, it’s the voters who are wrong”.

    This will probably be how the Democrats regroup after the loss.

  • El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    The fact that any group aside from white men voted for trumpism is the issue. The disconnect was the complicit main stream media sane washing the craziness. They put racism/homophobia/fascism on the same level as Harris’ policies.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 days ago

      Idk, white folks voting for Trump is an issue if you ask me, a white guy. Too many white folks sane washing his shit. Morning Joe went from “he’s a fascist” to “let’s put out differences aside”. Other whities need to realize this is a grift that will likely kill your own.

      • niucllos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        For sure, though I get the op point that at least Trump pretends to promise them something unlike every other group

  • sygnius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    As a data analyst, the way the two graphs are setup terribly. There’s really not enough information to come up with any conclusions from the charts.

    Also, first, there’s not enough information from the graphs to determine the situation since it’s only by percentages and not population. Second, our system is based on the winners of each state and used by the electoral votes. So overall popular vote isn’t going to determine who got elected, even if the chart showed all blue for all demographics.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Please be careful whenever you ask these questions. It’s so easy to blame one single minority group for a widespread failure. Of course analysis of individual voting groups is legitimate, as long as you properly frame what you’re doing.

    This is a serious issue both because of the connection with racism (i.e., it’s the Latinos’ fault) and abdication of responsibility (i.e., we bear no responsibility).

  • Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 days ago

    White people voting for the right is the problem. Like how can we go on here and blame Latinos for shifting when such a high percentage of white people voted for him? Especially when you factor in the population size and not just % left or right.

    I am ashamed of my peers.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Yeah, only around 2-3% of the white voters switching Dem would make up for the extra Latinos voting for Trump. On the other hand, blaming the voter instead of candidate is missing the point.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Less white people voted for trump in 24 though. The Latino bit is concerning because Democrats believed they had a demographic inevitability, and that appears to not be the case.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        It shouldn’t be concerning, it should be enlightening.

        But it won’t be. Not for the party leadership.

        Over the past 40 years they’ve gone from being the champion of blue collar and union workers nationwide, and being able to take those votes for granted…to having the rust belt become the biggest swing region in the country (which their opponent swept this month). Did they take this as a wake up call and do more for the blue collar voters to win their loyalty back?

        Nah, they just blame them and talk down to them, and tell them they’re too stupid to know what’s best for them.

        In that same time frame, they were seen as abandoning the blue collar worker to court the minority vote, talking their efforts at helping factory workers and turning them toward helping minorities in race and gender. While they were actually doing this they did indeed appear to gain that loyalty at the ballot box. Of course once they had it, they felt no need to keep up the good work for these people and have slowly become a party who does nothing for anyone, and runs on a platform of essentially admitting they do nothing, but that their inaction is better than the other side, so they should still be owed votes.

        Once again, this isn’t working out for them, and once again, rather than take it as a rejection of what they’re doing, no…it’s the voters who are wrong.

        I despise the GOP as much as any reasonable person, and I firmly believe that many of their voters won’t like what they voted for once they start to get it…but there’s no denying that the GOP has a message, goals, and demonstrable progress toward them. And to counter that…the Democrats have…“I think things are good and I wouldn’t change anything. You should vote for me because I’m not MAGA aligned, and if you don’t, it’s your fault not mine.”

        Arrogance is off-putting, and it appears it’s going to take at least a half century for the Democrats to figure that out.

  • Bear@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Whole thread full of people blaming an entire race and sex whether that’s Latinos, Latino men, Whites, or White men. You ask a stupid question and you get stupid answers.