President Biden’s hypocrisy on full display: Pardons his own son after making a point about ‘independent’ justice"

In a move that’s being hailed as a “full and unconditional” pardon, President Joe Biden has announced that he’s granting his son Hunter Biden a free pass for all federal charges related to his time between 2014-2024. Just 50 days before leaving office, Biden had previously declared that he wouldn’t be making the move, stating he’d abide by the jury’s decision. But now, it seems he was just playing a different tune.

TL;DR

President Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, who was facing up to 25 years in prison for lying on a federal form about his drug addiction. This comes after months of saying he wouldn’t make the move, and is being met with criticism from politicians and others who called him out on his earlier stance. A case of “my family is more important than I am” - how about keeping your promises for once?

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yep, absolutely. Presidential powers should be used for the good of the country, not the good of your friends and family. There are many legitimate reasons to pardon people but them being related to you is not one of them.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      A fair point but do you think Hunter would have been prosecuted to the same extent if he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden?

      However, it may work out better in the end for him that they went after him for ALL the crimes, because now he’s pardoned for all of them and can’t be tried for them again. We know Trump wants to go after Joe, but he’ll have to come from a different direction.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        If he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden he wouldn’t have had the lifetime of cushy boardroom and lobbyist jobs to lead to being persecuted.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Oh no, the millionaire was prosecuted for breaking the law.

            Oh and don’t forget the unpaid taxes they were after him for as well.

            Why is everyone so mean to the millionaire presidents son, he has it rough.

              • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                That I should feel bad that the millionaire son of a president was targeted for breaking the law?

                No, I didn’t miss it. It’s a pointless point.

                  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Like I said, it’s a pointless point.

                    I don’t give a fuck if he the only reason he got a bit of justice is because he was targeted due to his father. Scum getting justice is scum getting justice regardless.

                    Instead of clamouring to defend millionaire for being singled out, why don’t you spend your energy arguing for every other one to get the same treatment?

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You’re not going to solve nepotism by showing a picture of Hunter’s dong in Congress.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      For the good of the country? This was literally always just a judgement call. “I think they deserve a pardon” is the only criteria there ever was. I’m sure there are examples you could claim were good for the country somehow, but I’m not sure how common that is