This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t even take a change of service provider to get there.

    Replika had what had very obviously become a virtual mate service too, until they decided “love” wasn’t part of their system anymore. Probably because it looked bad for investors, as happened for a lot of AI-based services people used for smut.

    So a bunch of lonely people had their “virtual companion” suddenly lobotomized, and there’s nothing they could do about it.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I always thought replika was a sex chatbot? Is/was it “more” than that?

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s… complicated.

        At first the idea was it’d be training an actual “replica” of yourself, that could reflect your own personality. Then when they realized their was a demand for companionship they converted it into virtual friend. Then of course there was a demand for “more than friends”, and yeah, they made it possible to create a custom mate for a while.

        Then suddenly it became a problem for them to be seen as a light porn generator. Probably because investors don’t want to touch that, or maybe because of a terms of servce change with their AI service provider.

        At that point they started to censor lewd interactions and pretend replika was never supposed to be more than a friendly bot you can talk to. Which is, depending on how you interpret what services they proposed and how they advertized them until then, kind of a blatant lie.