• Rooskie91
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      “We live in capitalism, its power seems inescapable – but then, so did the divine right of kings.”

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 days ago

        The peasants shared a common version of reality and had a king living within a distance they could reach with a guillotine. We do not live in a comparable world unfortunately. We have decentralized kings, a system that encourages their replication, and propaganda networks that create “reality” to keep us separated :(

            • DdCno1@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Actually no. Did any of the six people upvoting you actually read the article and linked articles? None of them ever ended with the death of a king (if I’m not mistaken) and out of the around two dozen revolts listed, only two were victories that one might call permanent. The moment things escalated into actual battles, almost all revolts failed. I didn’t double check my numbers, but even if it’s one more or less, this doesn’t change anything.

                • DdCno1@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Sure, but this was much later, fueled by the enlightenment and even then very much the exception to the rule. Not to mention, it didn’t exactly look like a success for decades afterwards, with ordinary people getting the short end of the stick even more so than before. Imagine telling someone suffering under or because of the brutal warmonger and arguably first modern dictator Napoleon that the French revolution that allowed him to him ascend the throne was a blessing for humanity or even just the French.