In the end you’re both still the ones committing genocide. Not the people who didn’t vote for it (not voting is a vote)
Stop trying to make this delusional talking point happen. Typical shitlib manipulation
Ps you don’t even live in a democracy…. Shitlibs did more to organize state violence against college kids protesting than they are doing to resist fascism. Thats why you fuckin lost and will always be losers and will take all of us down with you
Your downvote tears sustain me, not going to weasel your way out of being complicit in genocide. You went out of your way to consent to the corrupt state, and you refuse to tear it down. Everything that happens is your responsibility, regardless of which of your functionary parties are ruling. They all do the same thing and are on the same teamgame which is to perpetuate empire, capital accumulation and colonialism, only difference is strategy.
It’s a fundemental aspect of the medium, though. A bit of a stretch to call people cowards for interacting in the way the platform was designed around.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit i take it….
Solely ‘downvoting’ with no expressed reasoning besides presumably being butthurt and as one person said ‘because it’s presented wrong’ is coward like. It was designed around comments, the vote system is one aspect and the least important one that, i don’t think you know what ‘fundamental’ means.
I confess, I shouldn’t have used the less common meaning. “[…] why are you so aware of it?” would have been a more accessible phrasing. Why is it important to you?
Uhhh yeah…. We all are in more indirect ways, like in taxes and the products we support and use, which makes this look even more absurd to try and pass yourself off as innocent. Though some are more complicit than others…Some like to double down on it
The only tears here are from rolling our eyes too hard. You’re being downvoted not based on the merit of the arguments you bring, but on how you present them.
Why would someone choose to interact with you to discuss the issue, rather than the dozens of folks in here saying the same thing but in a less tedious way? You bring nothing novel except perplexingly bad bait. Thats the whole point here.
Err… Not not directly for, I admit, but I do work with the state dept on occasion. There’s a whole bunch of us in here, in fact. Decentralized platforms are extremely popular with policy-adjacent techies, I wonder why. But that’s really neither here nor there, because critically I’m not presenting my geopolitical opinions here, but you sure are. And in nearly the same breath you do that, you criticize OP as fodder for the “objectively stupid” but elsewhere reject the very notion of criticism of your own opinions. I don’t exactly need to cite the five canons (I’ll save you the trouble) to highlight the flaws in your behavior here.
In the end you’re both still the ones committing genocide. Not the people who didn’t vote for it (not voting is a vote)
Stop trying to make this delusional talking point happen. Typical shitlib manipulation
Ps you don’t even live in a democracy…. Shitlibs did more to organize state violence against college kids protesting than they are doing to resist fascism. Thats why you fuckin lost and will always be losers and will take all of us down with you
Your downvote tears sustain me, not going to weasel your way out of being complicit in genocide. You went out of your way to consent to the corrupt state, and you refuse to tear it down. Everything that happens is your responsibility, regardless of which of your functionary parties are ruling. They all do the same thing and are on the same teamgame which is to perpetuate empire, capital accumulation and colonialism, only difference is strategy.
crashing out while no one is talking to you is so funny
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
It’s a fundemental aspect of the medium, though. A bit of a stretch to call people cowards for interacting in the way the platform was designed around.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit i take it….
Solely ‘downvoting’ with no expressed reasoning besides presumably being butthurt and as one person said ‘because it’s presented wrong’ is coward like. It was designed around comments, the vote system is one aspect and the least important one that, i don’t think you know what ‘fundamental’ means.
But, if it’s not important, why are you so sensitive to it?
Sensitive? It was a passing remark used to segway into the actual point lol however, you can’t seem to get over it
I confess, I shouldn’t have used the less common meaning. “[…] why are you so aware of it?” would have been a more accessible phrasing. Why is it important to you?
You are complicit, by your own logic.
Uhhh yeah…. We all are in more indirect ways, like in taxes and the products we support and use, which makes this look even more absurd to try and pass yourself off as innocent. Though some are more complicit than others…Some like to double down on it
The only tears here are from rolling our eyes too hard. You’re being downvoted not based on the merit of the arguments you bring, but on how you present them.
Removed by mod
Why would someone choose to interact with you to discuss the issue, rather than the dozens of folks in here saying the same thing but in a less tedious way? You bring nothing novel except perplexingly bad bait. Thats the whole point here.
Removed by mod
(I think you replied to the wrong comment here)
Nope
Double post then, maybe? It really doesn’t make much sense contextually.
Removed by mod
It is beautiful that you insta downvoted my response here. True chef’s kiss moment.Seriously though, if you can’t recognize a rhetorical question why do you feel that your opinions on geopolitics are worth engaging with?
Removed by mod
Err… Not not directly for, I admit, but I do work with the state dept on occasion. There’s a whole bunch of us in here, in fact. Decentralized platforms are extremely popular with policy-adjacent techies, I wonder why. But that’s really neither here nor there, because critically I’m not presenting my geopolitical opinions here, but you sure are. And in nearly the same breath you do that, you criticize OP as fodder for the “objectively stupid” but elsewhere reject the very notion of criticism of your own opinions. I don’t exactly need to cite the five canons (I’ll save you the trouble) to highlight the flaws in your behavior here.