TL;DR: The CyberTruck is 17 times more likely to have a fire fatality than a Ford Pinto

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Never forget that Chrysler did the exact same thing with the Grand Cherokee that resulted in deaths and never faced accountability.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Agree to disagree. I really hate this era of cars. Take a hot hatch, but make it as ugly as you can. Then make it as heavy as possible and slap an 80bhp iron block in there, that way you have the worst of both worlds in both power and fuel economy. But just for good measure, also give it a 3 speed transmission with no overdrive as one last final fuck you, just to make that the car is as slow—and gas mileage is as terrible as allowed by the laws of physics.

      The 70s was by far the worst era for cars, especially American cars.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Even if I were to agree with you, the beauty of a 70s car is only skin-deep, given everything else that is wrong with them that I already mentioned in my previous comment.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, your laughably untrue comment that is pulling facts from some cheap economy cars in an attempt to generalize an entire era. lol

          • Krudler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can only think 70’s cars are beautiful if you weren’t alive in the 70’s.

            They were UGLY AS FUCK then and now. Just piss poor design in every way.

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The zillions of W123 Mercedes from that period that are still running to this day are an exception to that rule, arguably one of the best vehicle designs ever produced.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Indeed, I had W123 200 with a 4-speed manual, Pierburg carburetor and the matching white steel hub caps. Unfortunately it was totaled by an idiot riding a Triumph motorcycle. I walked away unhurt, thanks to the thick German steel ,and the motorcyclists ended up in traction for 3 months.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ll be honest, I like the aesthetics, but yeah modern materials and gas mileage would be nice. Seatbelts too.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Seeing a modern vehicle after a crash and how the person is doing its incredible how much crash safety has improved. I’ve seen vehicles that barely look like vehicles and the person walked away shaken but largely uninjured

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      fucking thank you. So many people have disagreed with me over the years. its even more baby mustang than the mustang 2. Like its the third child thats not trying to act tough like the second child, or all muscle no brains like the first child.

      If I could get one even in shit condition I’d want to rebuild it as an electric. I’d totally take a mustang 2 if I could get one too though.