• Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    All the pointing to these backends as though they’re platforms like the corporate platforms shows how much they’ve conditioned people into thinking in their terms.

    I see where you come from, but it’s still a platform, a network. It’s way more connected that WordPress.

    Piefed, Mbin and Lemmy have back and frontends, it’s not like you’re connecting directly to the instance using API calls

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I see where you come from, but it’s still a platform, a network.

      But that network is not Lemmy or kbin or mbin or piefed. That network is activitypub, the platform is activitypub. Those backends are just what you use to connect to the network, but you could use any other implementation (just that there aren’t that many right now).

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just because an application supports ActivityPub doesn’t mean it will be compatible.

        Lemmy and Peertube are barely compatible. Interoperability between fundamentally different software could be achieved, but is not a priority

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just because an application supports ActivityPub doesn’t mean it will be compatible.

          Well of course, but it could be made to be compatible!I feel like we’re kind of missing out here on the threadiverse cause we can’t see all those other things happening elsewhere.