• DocBlaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i don't think he's saying there's no value in AR, I just took from his quote that, the fact that it has to conform itself to your current restricted environment is an extreme limiting factor that VR can mostly better emulate with a simulated environment of similar layout anyway. there really are limited applications for successful MR where you can interact with your restricted environment safely and in a way that's more interesting than entirely virtualized besides pokemon go or something like that

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That depends on why you're using it, for displaying close range real world into that's exactly what you want but for prepackaged multimedia experiences (games and other stuff like remote interaction) it doesn't fit as cleanly, and he's probably only thinking about the latter.

      Mixed reality is excellent for tracking inventory (including at home, finding where you left your stuff), checking the status of and controlling networked devices, navigation, physical coordination, visual guides (especially if they can map onto the objects in front of you), etc…

      • DocBlaze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes that's what I mean, the applications of it mostly include enhancing the productivity of your current environment. things like projected statistics over a warehouse or something like that. but as a former gamedev I think carmack is thinking besides work apps if it's training for pilots or surgeons or something like that I'd think you may as well go full virtual though. AI is likely going to be doing that stuff soon enough anyway