That one person who is scum happens to have been the foreign affair minister, is still the deputy prime minister, and highly involved in the conflict, so yeah kind of important. On top of having a degree in Slavic & Russian history… she 100% knows better.
The quote is from Freeland's wikipedia, you can find it easily. It's not some obscure shit. It was also reported in the Globe & Mail, as aforementioned, and was a pretty big affair in Canada at the time. But you knew all that, you're just being purposely disengenious.
Alright now I see you're entirely disinterested in a conversation. sure bud, we all knew all along, it's all one massive conspiracy and we're being paid by [them] to say it. Fuck dude, this shit's childish. Though I'd still disagree with your conclusion there's the possibility I could be wrong, and would have found out through conversation. I've been nothing but respectful but here you come in and call me "purposely disengenious" (sic) for recognizing the facts but still disagreeing. Ok then, I guess we're playing assumptions and killing honest, good faith discussion.
To other people with a different perspective, please feel free to DM me I'd love to talk about this and perhaps I'm wrong about my convictions. If you're willing to discuss this in good faith, not claim I'm a bad actor when I ask for a citation, and have an honest discussion I'm willing to do the same as I did here beforehand. Lastly, wikipedia is not a source. Find their source, read that, research the source, and come to a conclusion. Don't blindly trust.
That one person who is scum happens to have been the foreign affair minister, is still the deputy prime minister, and highly involved in the conflict, so yeah kind of important. On top of having a degree in Slavic & Russian history… she 100% knows better.
The quote is from Freeland's wikipedia, you can find it easily. It's not some obscure shit. It was also reported in the Globe & Mail, as aforementioned, and was a pretty big affair in Canada at the time. But you knew all that, you're just being purposely disengenious.
Alright now I see you're entirely disinterested in a conversation. sure bud, we all knew all along, it's all one massive conspiracy and we're being paid by [them] to say it. Fuck dude, this shit's childish. Though I'd still disagree with your conclusion there's the possibility I could be wrong, and would have found out through conversation. I've been nothing but respectful but here you come in and call me "purposely disengenious" (sic) for recognizing the facts but still disagreeing. Ok then, I guess we're playing assumptions and killing honest, good faith discussion.
To other people with a different perspective, please feel free to DM me I'd love to talk about this and perhaps I'm wrong about my convictions. If you're willing to discuss this in good faith, not claim I'm a bad actor when I ask for a citation, and have an honest discussion I'm willing to do the same as I did here beforehand. Lastly, wikipedia is not a source. Find their source, read that, research the source, and come to a conclusion. Don't blindly trust.