• peanuts4life@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not obsessed with Stalin. I’m also not a Holocaust denier. You really seem keen on saying inflammatory things about me without any preceding context.

      I will observe that I think Stalin was an awful person who tarnished the reputation of socialism for a century. I don’t have anything against socialist, being one myself.

      I have a beef with apologist for failed communist states like the soviet onion. I feel they deeply misrepresent socialism.

        • peanuts4life@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s a semantic argument, then. To me a fascist is a Donald Trump. To me, Facisim is a broad set of characteristics which can be attributed to people outside of the context of Nazi Germany. For example, I might call an ancient emperor a fascist.

          Facisim to you is a political movement linked only to the Nazis and thier allies.

          That’s not unfair. It’s a different definition of the word.

            • peanuts4life@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Either you have a misunderstanding of what a tankie is in common vernacular, or I do.

              My definition of a tankie is as follows: A “tankie” is a term that originated in British politics, referring to individuals who unconditionally supported actions of the Soviet Union, including the use of military force to suppress dissent. Today, it’s often used more broadly to describe those who uncritically support or defend perceived socialist or communist authoritarian regimes, sometimes even in the face of human rights abuses. The term is typically used pejoratively within leftist circles.

              I don’t believe a communist is necessarily a tankie, but a tankie would call themselves a communist.

              Personally, as an American, I would never fly an American flag. To me, it represents the violence of the state, the genocide of the indigenous people, and capitalism.

              I believe that the Soviet union, as well as some modern communist states, have largely failed to represent the Marxist vision, and I am extremely critical of people who are embrace the theater of certain communist states.

                • JasBC@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  We can very obviously see how anti-communist revolution in Hungary is going for Hungarian trans people right now.

                  To blame “anti-communist revolution” for the decline of LGBT-rights in hungary when much of the anti-LGBT legislation came about near 20-years after Hungary became a democracy and during when the Hungarian Socialist Party, the successor of the Communist Party, was still the largest force in Hungarian politics is disingenuous.

                  I would like to point out that the word tankie was used to refer to people that specifically supported the Hungarian communists request for military aid against revolution in Hungary. (…) So in the original sense of the word, I am a tankie.

                  …it’s nice that you’re honest about being anti-democratic and that you have no qualms about calling yourself tankie in that context. Are you a “little green man” as well?

    • SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your historical notes are technically correct, and Stalin did even attempt to reach a pact with France to limit the potential expansion of Nazi Germany. However, once those initiatives failed, Stalin had no issue about pacting with Hitler instead to invade third countries together, which highlights how Stalin’s first priority was improving his geopolitical position, rather than an ideological opposition to nazism.

    • Quereller@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you deny the Molotov–Ribbentrop pact and the illegal attack on Poland by the Soviet union under its leader Josef Stalin?

        • Quereller@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No why should I ? A non aggression pact is not the same than occupying another country. The Jews which were deported to other parts of the Union were in deed saved from the Nazis.

            • JasBC@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only evil person here is you. How can you not only defend but celebrate a regime that during its reign of terror during the occupation of Poland put over 500-thousand Poles in prison, committed the Katyn Massacre, deported 1.7-million Poles to Siberia, raped over a 100-thousand women, and murdered over 150-thousand additonal Poles in cold blood, and then robbed Poland of the independence it had achieved after WW1, after 200-years of attempted cultural genocide by the Russian Empire?

              I am half-Polish, my father was born in Communist Poland - tell me how your crackhead ideology justifies your abhorrent views. Tell me how the Soviets rounding up innocent Poles and murdering them in cold blood, like happened to the families and friends of my grandparents, is to be celebrated as the Soviets “saving” anyone; how subjugating the Polish people and state for the next 40-years was something good.

              You’re simply a disgusting PoS, a certified A-grade fucking tankie.