• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    “justices in the majority did not explain why they decided this case the way they did.” oh great. another precedent thrown out.

    • Etterra
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the problem I’ve always had with precedent. It’s not law. It’s just “well these other judges did it this way so I guess I will too.”

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some leaders lead from the rear. I’m not saying that’s what’s happening here, but I admit I often worry about it whenever someone says “time to revolt” or similar.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Who CARES? The ONLY part of the Constitution that the Founders MEANT was the One that LETS US MURDER CHILDREN IN SCHOOL! EVERY other Amendment they COULDNT know what the Future held and would OBVIOUSLY Eliminate any Rights they Accidentally gave us! EXCEPT the Right to Shoot up Schools!

  • kobra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a temporary thing so any public outrage may actually sway a final decision made by the court?