• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got in this fight with a friend who had a painting created by another friend. It was skull, lighter, knife.

    He asked me what it meant, and I don’t remember what I said… But he jumped up with this victorious expression and went “No! It means nothing, it’s just skull, lighter, knife. Other friend painted it, and”. I got into some death of the artist philosophy and he started to get pissed the more I insisted it doesn’t matter what the artist though, it’s what you get out of it. The artist had a snug smile behind the other guy

    I got terrible grades in the essay portion of every AP lit test because my takes were different than the consensus. I just remember one of them where I tried to defend my take… But what I took out meant nothing to the author, but he insisted the critics were definitely way off

    Here’s the thing - no one does anything for one reason, or even zero reasons. Artists usually don’t have a hidden message beyond the story structure - all creation is a reflection of the creator. There’s no arbitrary or random - humans aren’t capable of that.

    It’s like looking at someone’s bedroom… There’s no version of a bedroom that says nothing about the occupant

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Talking about death of the author, I think I came across the furthest possible extent of it

      There’s an ancient Sumerian…joke? adage? parable? anecdote? That has gotten some attention in the usual places you’d imagine around the internet. Translated to English it says:

      A dog walks into a bar and says “I can’t see a thing, I’ll open this one.”

      It’s built like a joke, but if it was one the humorous element has been lost to time. No one gets it. Not even archaeologists. Hypotheses include:

      • It’s an aural pun for a language we no longer know how to pronounce. Imagine archaeologists in the year 6000 puzzling over “What’s black and white and red all over? A newspaper.” That joke already doesn’t work in written English because even a native English speaker might not get the pun if they first encountered the joke in print rather than spoken aloud, because the homophones aren’t spelled the same.

      • It’s a vocabulary pun that we no longer understand. “A man walks into a bar. The next man ducks.” Is just a non-sequitur unless you understand that the phrase “walks into a bar” means both “entered a drinking establishment” and “collided with a horizontal metal rod.” Does one or more of the words in the joke carry an additional meaning that has been lost to time?

      • It requires some cultural understanding that we lack. “A man walked into a wiring closet, and was shocked by what he saw.” If those future archaeologists reading this joke with no other context don’t understand what electricity is, it will be impenetrable to them. There is apparently a hypothesis that Sumerian bars doubled as brothels, so it’s a joke about a dog peeking at people fucking.

      We talk about “death of the author” in terms of, the author meant something while writing the work, the work means something to the audience when they read it, sometimes these two meanings are different, which of the two meanings is correct/matters? People have read all sorts of meanings into the cockatoo screeching in Citizen Kane; in an interview Orson Welles says the cockatoo was there simply to wake up the audience. If you do find meaning there where none was intended, is that meaning valid?

      The person who wrote the above joke has been dead twice as long as Jesus. We don’t know their identity and have no metatextual writings from them; no explanation of what this meant to them. We have no way to ask the author what he meant by this, and we don’t get the joke. We can read the text and understand its surface level meaning, and that’s it.

      So…what now?

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool story bro. I do mean that sincerely, it has the sort of energy that made me want to say that, but I am genuinely glad to have now heard that story, it’s pretty interesting

        My first thought was it might be a non sequitur, but it seems like it has too much structure for that or to be the earliest recorded troll.

        What I find fascinating is that we might find the answer - language has math, AI research has made us start looking at language as high dimensional shapes in information space. Turns out, not only do languages have a consistent rate of information expression when spoken, but there’s a common human shape to language

        Having just a few examples of writing and distance in time makes it harder, but with the combinations of studying language evolution (they have shockingly clever methods with a solid mathematical basis) and the many things we’re learning about the math of language (now that we’ve discovered it’s incredibly important technologically)…

        We might understand the joke one day, maybe even soon. Or maybe we won’t, because not enough information remains to definitely declare an answer. Or maybe this is the first troll, and over time more humans that had ever existed when the author wrote it will spend lifetimes trying to understand this weird, unsolved language puzzle.

        Maybe, as humans grow in number and specialize more and more, this specific joke spawns multiple fields of study

        Regardless, that dude was epic.