• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol ‘lower salaries’ they were never legitimately offering those salaries you boot gobbling fool

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Last place I interviewed, recruiter and I agreed with my qualifications etc I should ask for 90k. They hired someone for 67.5k with no qualifications. The person literally took a pay cut to take the job. I don’t get it.

      • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like they hired someone unqualified cause it cost them less and the person with no qualifications took it because so would you if that was your best option.

        • gataloca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why they hate things like welfare or full employment. They need a desperate army of reserve labor to keep wages low.