• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Do not patronize these systems, regardless of how small you think your individual impact might be. User counts are used to justify continued investments in these things.

        People need to just say no.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean they use electricity, you want to advocate for more renewables in your energy mix then it doesn’t matter that they use lots of it because it’s renewable anyway

          • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            then it doesn’t matter that they use lots of it because it’s renewable anyway

            It does, it always does. There’s for one grey energy, and more importantly this energy can’t be used somewhere else where otherwise fossil fuels were used. We should always be efficient with our energy use…

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              this energy can’t be used somewhere else where otherwise fossil fuels were used

              You think all nuclear power plants and renewables are running at max capacity all the time?

              • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Then we need to use it, there’s a high demand for hydrogen (not for electricity) for instance, so excess energy should just either be stored or converted to H.

          • bryndos@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Right so France will probably export less electricity to Germany. Germany will . . . a) use less power b) burn more coal/gas

            OK so lets invent option c) where we get Germany build some more nukes. Fine in 20 years time they might have 3-4GW of new nuke capacity, but in the meanwhile . . . there will have been several new data centres built in that time, and millions of houses in the UK will have started using aircon . . . and . . . we’ll be getting pretty close to 500ppm global carbon dioxide anyway.

            https://www.climate.gov/sites/default/files/styles/full_width_stretch_featured_image/public/2025-05/ghg-1-co2.png?itok=Krb3c_bB

            If you’re going to keep having more people, and people are going to keep buying the same or more stuff each, this line will keep going up.

    • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Edit : My bad, some obvious AI artifacts

      Insane that people can’t tell this is a low effort Photoshop and think it’s AI. Look it’s literally a picture of a cropped cruise ship overlapped with a plane. It’s 5min of Gimp

        • bryndos@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          yeah at first glance i thought photoshop; but what human’d spend the time to photoshop that right most engine into the wrong place and make the wing wavy told Maybe this is AI being told to draw an image “in the style of a bad photoshop job”.

        • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah you are right. Didn’t notice the wrong wings. I was looking at the fact it managed to make an entire cruise ship look normal as evidence it was photoshop.