• sartalon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t disagree with your sentiment.

      I think it is bad enough though, without the news source twisting it for sensationalism.

      *Edit. Hmm, I guess you people are ok with lies as long as they support the narrative you want. Is this suddenly a GoP sub?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gotcha. Hey, how much oil has to be objectively confirmed to 7 significant figures before You’re concerned? How much is okay for you?

        • sartalon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Any.

          Doesn’t mean I’m going to lie about the amount to get clicks.

          Let me ask you a similar question.

          How much of a lie does it need to be before you are willing to call it a lie?

      • TwoGems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you’re concerned with how much oil leaked? Does it matter? This shouldn’t be happening.