He’s not alone: AOC and others have argued lawmakers should be paid more in order to protect against corruption and make the job more accessible.

  • Nina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have no type of economics experience, but what if representatives of a demographic of people should be paid the median wage of those people, with high punishment for corruption and bribes?

    If they would like to earn more, they should lift their states’s lowest wages. This goes down to all levels, a mayor of a city only earns the median wage of the city. It is a civil servant job after all, it shouldn’t be glamorous.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is a good idea in theory, but it doesn’t really hold up when you look at what we ask reps to do.

      They have to maintain two households, basically, and have a lot of travel expenses.

      State legislatures are a great sandbox to review how pay impacts the folks who can afford to hold seats. Turns out, the less they’re paid, the more likely they are to be independently wealthy. You will never “show them what it’s like” to be poor by paying them less - you’ll just ensure that actual normal people can’t afford to take the position.

      I think it was Maine that had a fully volunteer legislature? And had the richest legislature ever.

      Ultimately, this is another problem of America trying to retain an agricultural mindset (part time legislature so that everyone could go home to farm), despite the world having changed.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        So if they have to keep up two household, let them have two average incomes. It would still be less.

    • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The average income in Alabama is 49K per year. The average cost of living in DC is 78k per year. Representatives need to have a home in their district while also working in DC.

      The best outcome of your change would be to limit being a representative to someone already rich enough to not need their salary

      If not, since your proposal heavily prevents corruption and bribes, you’d be forcing the Rep to work a second job or be homeless

      • eltrain123@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Representatives don’t need to own a home in DC.

        The president doesn’t own the White House, it comes with the position and goes to the next person elected after they serve their term.

        There is no reason the state can’t own property in DC that comes with use during service.