• Bucky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Society will never progress while Fox News is allowed to remain on the air. Fox News creates digital walls to segregate the audience from reality.

    • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember a time when news for most people came from the local paper and/or a 30 minute network evening TV show. Both were written by real journalists who attempted to be unbiased.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        1 year ago

        Read up on roger Ailes and Reagan destroying ‘The Fairness Doctrine.’

        Back in the day, you could only own two radio stations in one town [AM and FM] and any editorial had to provide time for rebuttal.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              And cancelling Apollo. The Saturn V was the greatest engineering achievement of the human race. If the Wright brothers had done their first flight and 8 years later some group flew a 747 across the Pacific ocean it would have been by multiple measures a less impressive achievement.

              He cancelled the remaining missions and shelved the rocket. Within 2 years it could no longer be built and the country that went to the moon could not put a human into space. In the 50 years since then no rocket has come close to what it could do.

              And he did it all for tax cuts.

      • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is, until Sinclair and Clear Channel started gobbling up local affiliates to push their own narratives.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fox News tapped an audience which was already open to such bullshittery. Removing Fox News does not remove that audience. We need to better understand why a significant proportion of the population (not just of the US, but of the world) embraces fascism and the structures that drive towards it. Then, to identify how to convince fascists to abandon fascism.

      • brothershamus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree with the point that Fox News tapped that audience, disagree that removing them wouldn’t help.

        Media literacy must be included as part of primary education. How do we know things? How do we find out things? What does it mean to “create a podcast”? etc.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ideally, yes, it would be better if we lived in a world where there was not a niche for Fox News to fill. But again, removing Fox News would not remove that niche. Something else would fill the vacuum created by its absence.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They (GOP) created the audience over decades by gutting education, social support programs and encouraging racism.

        By the time fox came around people were ripe to be abused.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mostly agree, but I think that’s just one step removed. It’s not like the GOP (more correctly, conservatism) erected everything out of whole cloth, against a social democrat utopia that already existed. There has always been a very overlapping and sizeable Euler diagram of populism, conservatism, nationalism, and fascism, extending back into the tribal fog of prehistory.

          It’s easy to point the finger at the primary bogeymen of today, and that over simplification is a major way that these horrible political and social views propagate. Their messaging is wrong, but it’s easy, and generally speaking, people prefer easy to complicated, with disregard to what’s more accurate.

          The technology that allows powerful people to make war with each other and oppress the weak has vastly outpaced the advancement of more inclusive social and political philosophies. We’re going to need to come to a better understanding that we humans are all together one tribe. We need to be dedicated to the common good, not only of people like us, but of people unlike us, too, on the basis that we are all people.

      • Alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maindrivers of fascism are the insane people fearmongering and stoking nationalism in a bid for more power and money. It’s corruption and nonsense all the way down only made possible by poor education and voter participation. FPTP and lax campaign laws make it easy for the super wealthy to influence elections behind the scenes too. A lot of democracies are still run with systems designed by ancient wealthy romans for the benefit of ancient wealthy romans and are left unchanged. It’s to the surprise of noone when billionaires act like emperors in modern times with inequality on the rise everywhere and with news indistinguishable from entertainment given how the fairness doctrine has been long abolished even if that was precisely why it existed in the first place.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do we? Hasn’t there been lots of books written by Europeans who lived thru the 1930s documented step by step how their nation fell.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Books that the majority of Americans are too apathetic, ideologically poisoned or just busy to read, much less take concrete actions as a result.

          I wish it wasn’t so, but that’s the current reality. Telling your average Faux News viewer to read and honestly reflect on objective history books is a fool’s errand.

          We have to fight intolerance not with the information of the tolerant, but with vilification, exclusion and other severe consequences for their misanthropic words and actions.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sure there are. I couldn’t name a single one, and I am quite certain that there are zero US secondary schools that teach any of them. When I was in high school, we didn’t even get into WW1 in history class, and there’s been 35 years more history since then. We didn’t even get to the rise of fascism in the 20th century; no wonder it’s on the rise again.

    • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If people weren’t as stupid, they’d already be ignoring fox news.

      The solution to misinformation isn’t censorship, it’s for people to be better educated. Are we supposed to ban every conspiracy theory website? If so, who gets to decide what is the truth and what is “misinformation”? The same type of government organization that is now banning books in florida? No thanks.

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Educated fascists abound.

        Not that anyone should take you seriously, with that inane conclusion. ‘Oh, arresting kidnappers? Like the kidnappers did? No thanks.’

        • notacat@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a negative correlation between education and support for Trump.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably but I bet the correlation is weak. Do you have a study that shows otherwise? I know engineers generally are more conservative compared to the other science-y white collar professions but I know several engineers who have the same level of education as I do who are total redhats.

            I don’t discuss politics at work. That is my safe place from that bullshit.

          • mindbleach@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And yet: “education” is never the panacea people pretend it is, when they scoff at DIRECT solutions to visible problems. ‘Don’t take action! Let’s opine about a generation-long project to prevent this from happening again.’

            Because if there’s anything safe from the meddling of disinformation-pushing conservative bastards, it’s school.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe when people talk about education and schooling it’s about the future, not the present. The current generations are already set in their ways.

              So to take ‘direct action’ would depend on what actions you’re actually able to take.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing, I know fantasy, I would like to see is editoral being labeled as such. Yes, that includes those round table talking head things. Just a banner on the bottom that said “editorial, not news”.

  • cerevant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    “91% of Fox viewers conditioned to never say anything bad about someone with a R next to their name, regardless of what they actually believe”

    FTFY

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ronald Reagan famously said that the “eleventh commandment” was: “Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.”

      The phrase was coined in the 1960s by Gaylord Parkinson, who was the state chairman of California Republicans at the time: “Henceforth, if any Republican has a grievance against another, that grievance is not to be bared publicly.”

      https://politicaldictionary.com/words/eleventh-commandment/

        • orbitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Semi spoiler but haven’t watched Meet the Parents? That’s actually the first time I found out it was an actual name but it’s older now I know. Sorry if that spoiled it for anyone but it’s literally the last joke of the movie. If you haven’t seen it, I recommend it, not outstanding but solid comedy, plus has the best nipple joke.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not that it ever did Trump’s ratings any harm, calling them traitors, losers and everything in between.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      While some people may be quick to throw the word “conservative” around, it is important to remember that there is a distinction between someone being self-centered and unsympathetic, and someone who has Conservative Personality Disorder. Many people may have what doctors call conservative characteristics, such as feeling entitled or having a strong sense of self-importance. People who have conservative personality disorder may be challenging to deal with.

      The first step to determine your dynamic with someone who you think is a conservative is to know the difference between someone with conservative tendencies and someone with Conservative Personality Disorder.

      PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HAVE CONSERVATIVE PERSONALITY DISORDER, BUT HAVE CONSERVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS MIGHT:

      Need continual approval and/or admiration

      Take advantage of other people

      Fail to acknowledge or be concerned about the needs of others

      Have an escalated sense of self

      Generally, conservatives can be pretentious. In other words, they think that they are better than others, and continuously seek out praise.

      Having a conservative in your life may be maddening and emotionally challenging. You may feel like your whole relationship with this person revolves around them, leaving no room for yourself and your emotions. It can be easy to feel judged by this person. You may even feel exhausted by this individual’s demands.

      Conservative Personality Disorder is one of several types of personality disorders. Despite the inflated confidence that conservatives portray, they often have extremely fragile self-esteem. Even the slightest criticism can harm their self-esteem.

      People who suffer from Conservative Personality Disorder may be overall unhappy and dispirited when they are not given special treatment or treated the way that they expect. Many relationships may feel unfulfilling to them, and others may not enjoy their company.

      THE SIGNS, SYMPTOMS, AND SEVERITY OF CONSERVATIVE PERSONALITY DISORDER CAN ALTER PERSON-TO-PERSON. SOME SYMPTOMS MAY INCLUDE:

      Having an inflated sense of self-importance

      Demand having the best of everything (e.g., best house, best car, best clothes)

      Holding a sense of entitlement

      Mandating continual, immoderate appreciation

      Behaving in an arrogant manner that comes across as conceited and/or pretentious

      Always expecting to be acknowledged as superior

      Being jealous of others

      Believing that others are jealous of them

      Overvalue their achievements and skills

      Having the inability to acknowledge other’s needs and emotions

      Being distracted by dreams of authority, triumph, perfection, the perfect partner, or excellence

      Taking advantage of others to benefit them

      Expecting special favors to align with their expectations

      Believing that they are superior

      Only speaking to people who they believe are on their level

      Dominating conversations

      Looking down on people they view as inferior

      IN YOUR RELATIONSHIP, THE CONSERVATIVE MAY:

      Try to isolate you from your friends and family

      Instruct you on how to act and feel

      Question your reality or try to gaslight you

      Blame you for things outside of your control

      Supervise your whereabouts

      Project their flaws onto you

      Fail to take your opinions and needs into account

      IF YOU ARE DEALING WITH A CONSERVATIVE, TRY THE FOLLOWING TIPS:

      1. DO NOT REACT

      Conservatives depend on your emotional reactions. It can be easy to react in a way that showcases your shock, anger, or hurt, but this will only energize the conservative. Instead, try to focus on the situation at hand, and try not to leave space for projection. By continuously steering the conversation back to the issue at hand, you take away the opportunity from the conservative to dominate the conversation.

      1. TRY TO AVOID DIRECT CONFRONTATION

      As stated previously, conservatives are sensitive to any kind of criticism. Calling out the conservative is hardly ever helpful. This can even be a trigger for their anger. In the case that you do need to give negative feedback, try to frame it, in the same way, you would a compliment.

      1. REITERATE YOUR NEED FOR ACTION OVER PROMISES

      Conservatives can be great at making fictional plans for the future, and never following through on their promises. If you want to hold a conservative accountable, you need to challenge the deception. It is important to not fulfill any of their requests unless they reciprocate the energy.

      1. MAINTAIN BOUNDARIES

      Conservatives may easily cross boundaries. While they can break others’ boundaries, they prioritize their own. It is important to set and strongly maintain your boundary with this individual. You may want to easily outline what you will and will not accept in your relationship with this individual. While it may be difficult at times, you should always stand up for yourself.

      1. REMIND YOURSELF THAT YOU ARE NOT TO BLAME

      If anything does not go their way, a conservative may point the finger at you. In addition to your boundaries, you may want to limit the responsibility that you hold in their life. When the blame is put on you, do not accept it.

      1. DON’T ACCEPT THEIR BEHAVIOR

      Conservatives are typically aware when they hurt others’ feelings. Their behavior is normal to them, but that is not the same case for other people. You may feel the need to gently point out their undesired behaviors. Conservatives do not like to be viewed in a negative light, so this allows them to adjust their behavior.

      1. ACKNOWLEDGE WHEN YOU NEED PROFESSIONAL HELP

      Conservative abuse may not be overt, therefore it can be difficult to know whether or not you are a victim. You may easily fall into a cycle of conservative abuse. This can lead to feeling trapped. Symptoms of conservative abuse vary; however, if you are questioning your self-worth, it may be helpful to seek counseling from a licensed professional who specializes in identifying and assisting people who endure conservative abuse.

      1. KNOW WHEN YOU NEED TO LEAVE A RELATIONSHIP

      Conservatives know how to manipulate situations and deceive people. They may use methods like gaslighting and projection to try to alter your reality and gain control. If you are beginning to feel confused or lost, it may be time to exit the relationship. It is important to never lose sight of yourself. Conservative Abuse Syndrome is real. If you think that you are experiencing it, you may benefit from talking to a licensed mental health professional. If you are unsure if your relationship is unhealthy, you will benefit from reading our blog “How To Tell If You’re In A Toxic Relationship.”

      Dealing with a conservative can be overwhelming, but you are not alone in your struggles. There are many survivors of narcissistic abuse, and speaking to a licensed mental health counselor is helpful if you are unable to recover on your own.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re torn. The intelligent pragmatists don’t want a repeat of the 2020 election. The emotional loyalists are doing that thing where you consider loyalty to be a pretty high virtue all on its own, and thus don’t abandon your boy when he runs into trouble, regardless of how much it may or may not be deserved.

    You could consider, if he was a family member, or if you were all members of the same mafia, would you turn on him or stick around and watch his back when he starts getting into trouble?

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That poll probably fucked with. That our Fox viewers and fucking morons. Most likely Fox has all it’s viewers blind to the crimes that he has committed and they watch nothing else.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the Fox (and Newsmax) news I’m exposed to, there were zero mentions of Trump indictments that weren’t tinged with “corrupt FBI” sentiment over the last 2 weeks.

        It’s been wall to wall Hunter tax evasion bullshit.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not the biggest Biden supporter but that Hunter stuff has made me support him more. If this is all they got on a man who has been in office longer than I have been alive that is pretty freaken impressive. Positive if I held high office for a fraction of that time I would have made way more mistakes.

          Oh wow his son is a screw up. Big wow. I didn’t vote for his son.

        • Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just like Clinton and the blowjob. Clinton and Benghazi. It is a nothingburger the far right is trying to push and waste taxpayer money on.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your point is taken. There was a local leader in my area that was R but soft-R and again local leader. When Trump won the primary he sent out an email to me and I guess everyone else on his list basically saying that it was our duty to support him.

      I told him that it was his duty not mine and I vote how I choose. Wish I had said something more witty.

    • mookulator@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt this describes most Fox News viewers. I suspect a majority of them fall into a third category of “blind believers”. Fox News tells them the indictments are a sham, they believe it’s a sham. Especially when it’s sandwiched between two things that make them angry.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d be surprised how few of them actually are brainwashed enough not to realize the flow they’re going with is pretty dark. They just tend to think the world itself is dark, and is supposed to be dark. So things like cheating and corruption are signs of health, not bad things.

        They’re very backwards in some ways. Good is bad, bad is good.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s probably more truth in this than everyone in this discussion would want to admit.

      They secretly want Trump, but they’re embarrassed in public to say that.

  • Hairyblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Propaganda works.

    When I was in school and learned about propaganda, I thought how do people believe in crazy lies. Like a Korean dictator having a divine birth, walking at 3 weeks of age, or not pooping. It is because propaganda works if that is all the info you have.

    • its_pizza@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This really hit me hard once I had a kid.

      The degree to which those small early lessons will stick in their mind, much less something that’s ingrained in their heads every single day.

      I think I get it now - if kids are hearing this stuff day in and out from the moment they can talk - that they absolutely could be convinced that Trump or Putin or Xi are some kind of divinity. Even when they later learn otherwise, there will be some kernel of that propaganda remaining in their head.

      Some people reach a phase where they’re really ready to question these things, but I met plenty of people in college for whom that dissonance was just too unexpected and painful. They simply retreated into what they already identified with.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what peak propaganda looks like.

    It only took 36 years.

    That’s how long ago the FCC’s Fairness Doctrine was abolish. It should come to no one’s surprise that it was abolished under the Reagan Administration.

    For those that do not know, the Fairness Doctrine essentially forced TV News to present BOTH sides to a story in an unbiased manner. There are many people reading this who were not even alive when this was abolished which means they have always had biased news in their lives. It amazes me how rarely the Fairness Doctrine is brought up when it comes to the destruction of our news media and ways the Right has tried to undermine our democracy and shift this country’s attitudes toward the Right.

    What is equally infuriating to me is when I hear people on the Left endlessly waffle from one rather insignificant topic to the next that they should focus their efforts on, and ultimately never getting anywhere. Enacting some type of new Fairness Doctrine should be near the top of the list of things the Left should be pushing for. An unbiased news media is the foundation that a democracy is built on. The news media is how the general public becomes educated on what is happening and that simply can’t happen when they lie endlessly like FOX News so famously does (other stations do as well, but few do it as well as Fox does). But the Left doesn’t focus on things like the Fairness Doctrine because it admittedly isn’t a “sexy” topic. It doesn’t get people’s attention. And it isn’t something that can get solved in a few weeks. The lack of focus is frustrating.

    Anyways, this topic put me on a tangent that nearly no one will read, but people love to react to what is happening this instant, but rarely ever think about how we got to this point. These bamboozled Fox News watchers didn’t simply wake up one day and believe all the shit that network spews out. The Right plays the long game on things and having an army of brainwashed listeners takes years and even decades to develop. The Left needs to learn this strategy.

    Sorry for the rant.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fairness Doctrine reinstated and enforced on anything claiming to act as news would definitely go a long way towards fixing the political hellscape fascist billionaires have created in their endless greed. Their strategy works off of fear and nationalism, you won’t be able to replicate it on the Left and still retain an audience of freethinkers, the propaganda is designed to wear people down and make them dumber than when they initially tuned in. Only authoritarians seek to erode the meaning of words for their own gain like the Right does on Fox, the best longterm strategy the Left has is education and voter-participation. - Things the Right undercut and underfund every chance they get.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing is they don’t believe he committed any crimes because Fox keeps telling them he didn’t.

      This is like saying that 91% of members of the KKK hold racist views.

      It is actually quite interesting that the number is only 91%, that means that some people are watching Fox who do have a brain, I don’t know why they’re doing that.

      • Alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        some people are watching Fox who do have a brain, I don’t know why they’re doing that.

        They watch it for the entertainment value that it uses to defend itself in court - or they’ve yet to be worn down by the stupid nonsense they spout altogether.

  • style99@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Watching too much TV in general causes mental disorders, but watching Fox “News” clearly causes severe brain damage. You’d be better off sniffing glue.

    • Mdotaut801@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could huff air duster for a year straight and not damage my brain as much as Faux news damages boomer brains.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are really losing a generation of elderly and it is depressing. I had to deal with a few like that once and bite my tongue. One day I had it and just demanded to know why I didn’t know how many grandkids each of them had.

        How is it I can hear you guys talk for hours a day for freaken weeks and not one of you has bothered to tell me about your grandkids? You can’t talk to me for a half an hour without knowing about my kids. There is no way the subject won’t come up. And yet you 3 just go on and on and on about politics.

        They didn’t have an answer and I am not completely proud of myself for snapping like that. Still bothers me. Is this my future? An old grumpy shit ranting at other old grumpy shits with my family, career, hobbies, dreams, memories forgotten and not worth mentioning?

  • rDrDr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    These are not smart people. You can ignore their opinions. They are lizards. They hate failure and weakness. As soon as Trump falters, they will pretend that they never supported him. These people would have died for George Bush, and he became a laughing stock within a couple years.

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only 42%? That’s more than enough to win the primary if Fox news is a comparable sample of primary election voters.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, people who actually believe what Fox “News” provides are lost to humanity, anyway. I don’t think that the court gives a shit about the believes of Fox “News” disciples.