• Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s pretty disgusting that here in 2024 they would still use outdated and inappropriate terms like horsepower and foot-pounds.

    • ame@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      For some reason one of my calc classes in college used imperial instead of metric and it really highlighted the absurdity of it

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s called an XBus now. Yes it’s not better.

    But this is actually a pretty cool ev, the bed is swappable.

  • SomeBoyo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just 20 HP? I need something that is able to survive while I’m farming. At least give us 40 HP.

  • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    20 Hit points for a car isn’t much if we’re going by traditional RPG metrics, but I suppose I’m not sure what the creators were using as a template when they made it.

    • paholg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Depends on how traditional you want to get. The original metric was the number of 14" shells something could survive. Given that, 20 seems pretty good for a car.

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I hate EV torque ratings. They’re not even remotely comparable to ICE vehicles.

    The power ratings for the eBussu don’t adhere to SAE-J2908, btw.

    Please use SAE-J2908.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Couple of years ago the use of slang that consisted of making portmanteaus of the word “pussy” (using the suffix “-ussy”, also word of the year 2022 IIRC) with other words rose. At first it was mostly for implying said thing was used as a pussy (thrussy: throat pussy, bussy: boy pussy) but then it evolved into a comedic way to refer to “hole of said thing” (chussy: hole in the chest as in pectum excavatum).

      In this case, this vehicle is called eBussy because it’s a tiny electric bus. But due to the slang, it can also be interpreted as “electronic boy pussy (as in a guy’s anus, for gay sex)”.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Torque is a stupid, meaningless figure in almost any situation, but particularly in a vehicle where there is a transmission involved.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        it directly measures their ability to get up to speed

        No, it doesn’t. power measures how fast the vehicle will get up to speed, torque is meaningless unless you know the RPM that torque is being made at.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          9 months ago

          Most legitimate torque ratings include at what rpm. Many articles do not include all the details.

          • Bilb!@lem.monster
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re both completely wrong. The only important measurement of a vehicle is spirit

          • QuinceDaPence@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            To accelerate a vehicle we need to put kinetic energy into it and Power is the measure of how fast we can do that.

            From a technical capability standpoint, torque is a useless measure. With a motor of a given power you can always gear it up or down to whatever torque you need (assuming a lossless transmission system).

            If we take two identical trucks with 10k lb trailers on them and one’s a 800ft-lb diesel and one’s a 300ft-lb gas, both with 400hp, they sould realisticly accelerate and climb a hill at the same rate. The diference is the gas engine will be screaming at 6/7/8000 rpm and guzzling gas. (This also assumes no other factors like heat cone into play, the gas may not be able to maintain as much power due to cooling system designs or other factors).

            Torquey-er engines also tend to feel better from a driveability standpoint but that’s not representative of capability.

            • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              What? Torque tells you what force can be applied at what distance from the center of rotation. Acceleration is a function of mass and force. Of course more torque is going to get you to accelerate faster.

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                Remember, power is torque times RPM, which is your accelerating force. It’s a functionally useless measurement without RPM.

                An engine with half the torque revving twice as fast will make an equal amount of power, and accelerate equally fast.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Also wrong. If you compare two otherwise identical vehicles, the one with more power will both accelerate faster and have a higher top speed, assuming it has the gearing to use that power.

            Stop getting all your vehicle knowledge from old top gear episodes.