• Deckweiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    njal.la

    created by the pirate bay founder Peter Sunde.

    I had a great experience with the service so far, no hoops to jump through, no obfuscated pricing, no personal data.

    Their VPN and Server options are very pricey, but the domain prices are great.

    I may have misunderstood your question. If you are looking specifically for a top level domain, I think .org is a decent one, as it is hosted by a non profit organization (even though there were some sellout debates in 2020)

          • SecurityPro@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 months ago

            Context (from the FAQ):

            "We’re not actually a domain name registration service, we’re a customer to these. We sit in between the domain name registration service and you, acting as a privacy shield.

            When you purchase a domain name through Njalla, we own it for you. However, the agreement between us grants you full usage rights to the domain. Whenever you want to, you can transfer the ownership to yourself or some other party."

            • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              afaik, that is the only way to legally have an anonymous whois entry on the clearnet (please correct me if I am wrong)

              • darkmatternoodlecow@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You are not wrong, but there is a reason that identification requirements exist for domain registration. In any case, however, at the end of the day a person who registers a domain through Njalla does not have ownership of the domain. This is not an insignificant fact no matter how you spin it. It’s not your domain. You’re blindly trusting someone whose credentials are to have pirated movies two decades ago with something that might potentially be tremendously valuable, if to no one else but yourself.

                Unless you’re literally doing something illegal, choosing Njalla over a regular vendor offering WHOIS privacy is to move beyond privacy consciousness into the realm of paranoid recklessness.

                • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I more or less agree with you.

                  Do you know of an alternative service, which is easy to use, allows a private whois entry, but gives you the ownership of the domain?

                  Before njalla, I tried domain.com and I couldn’t get the domain in 2 days after ordering it, so I cancelled. (they wrote an email saying that they are reviewing my order and will get back to me in 24h, which they didn’t).

                  I just want to pay and get a domain without the hoops and without giving them my personal address and phone number.

              • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                I think in Europe the domain name providers (or would one rather call them resellers ?) switched to redacting all private domain holder information since a few years. It was actually quite horrible like it was before, so much email spam, a free ticket for spammers to put all those Whois information wide open on the Internet. Some providers, like Greenhost in NL, provided Whois masking (cloaking ?) for customers paying a bit more.

    • delirious_owl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Free, more secure, and only accessible by ~2% of Internet users

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Interesting choice, thanks. I guess for email with an onion domain I’d have to self host the email.

      • Vojtěch Fošnár@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah but this way you can only communicate with other Tor users. Also the mail server can prolly easily leak your actual IP if you don’t harden it well.

      • neutron@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The .onion means it’s an onion service. This requires a Tor connection both for the host and the users. And frankly, hosting an onion service is not exactly easy to do it right, due to additional security considerations. Many self hosting guides assume a typical residential connection or a rented VPS without an onion service.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Namecheap gets good reviews as far as I know but not sure I’d like to go with anything USA based if I can avoid that.