• Risk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Define art, though.

    As it stands neural networks and LLMs can’t do it, because they lack imagination. A human can use it as tool to make art though, and we don’t have these silly kinds of conversations about photoshop (anymore!).

    As for the OP, you’ve taken it a bit more literally and reacted a bit more defensively than I think is warranted. The point is about our systems priorities, not so much the specifics.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I have a feeling if we performed a lobotomy-like surgery on someone that eliminated their imagination and told them to just put paint on a canvas, you’d still call that art.

      I would, at least. There’s some subjectivity to the definition of art and what people think has artistic value.

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Of course. That’s the point; it’s subjective, and yet we have people declaring that AI/LLM output isn’t art.

        I miss when Lemmings actually replied why they were downvoting…