I do not understand why we don’t just plant switch grass and be done with it? It’s native to a large swath of the arable land, doesn’t require as much (in some areas any) irrigation and it’s good for the soil.
https://cropwatch.unl.edu/benefits-switchgrass-hay-and-forage
Edit:
Also 6.24 is closer to a third of 19.25 than it is a half. Which is still a massive amount of water. Why inflate the numbers by saying nearly a half?
It’s because you have to use your water to keep water rights. Flood irrigating alfalfa is an easy way to use up a lot of water to keep the rights without having to manage more complex farms. The current way that water rights works creates perverse incentives.
I do not understand why we don’t just plant switch grass and be done with it? It’s native to a large swath of the arable land, doesn’t require as much (in some areas any) irrigation and it’s good for the soil. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/benefits-switchgrass-hay-and-forage
https://utia.tennessee.edu/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/269/2023/10/SP701-B.pdf
Edit: Also 6.24 is closer to a third of 19.25 than it is a half. Which is still a massive amount of water. Why inflate the numbers by saying nearly a half?
What’s even more frustrating is that it’s not useful. Here’s an article about Utah’s water usage WRT alfalfa:
So, Utah is using 2/3 of their water to produce 0.2% of their GDP and exports almost a third of it. It’s completely stupid…
It’s because you have to use your water to keep water rights. Flood irrigating alfalfa is an easy way to use up a lot of water to keep the rights without having to manage more complex farms. The current way that water rights works creates perverse incentives.
Water which evaporates from reservoirs or wetlands isn’t “drawn” from the river for human use. So it’s about half of water removed for human use
Thanks for the clarification!
I dont understand why we dont ban cattle breeding & importing and be done with it?