• @kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    623 months ago

    I like how they’re responding to the flood of shit basically instantly. No more leeway, no more delays. He has to fucking go to trial.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      303 months ago

      At what point do they decide he’s being frivolous and tell him to shut the fuck up?

        • @MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          203 months ago

          He’s losing so much. The other day a man came up to him, tears streaming down his face. He says, “please, sir! You’ve got to stop losing. I’m a Democrat and I can only get so erect!”

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          163 months ago

          Don’t worry. Trump is incapable of shutting the fuck up, so you’ll still get headlines.

      • @geekworking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        One of the things that they are filling frivolous motions about are a procedural order to limit a flood of last-minute frivolous filings to try to delay the case.

        They can’t really tell him to STFU because that would give him actual grounds for appeal, but they can enforce established deadlines to file stuff. Like the deadline to consider immunity that past a long time ago, which lets them immediately reject the claim now.

  • @blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 months ago

    Why does he get so many attempts? Trump has really been exposing a problem with appeals law. There doesnt seem to be any standardization for cutoff.

    • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The courts are generally willing to work anyone filing the correct paperwork in the correct timeframes. And each of those timeframes have subsequent timeframes for response. It’s is all about giving defendants enough time to mount the best defense they can. You can only try someone once (barring mistrials which they try to avoid as much as possible) so it needs to be done correctly the first time.

      Trump is a master of abusing these deadlines one at a time to cause as many delays as possible. Most defendants and lawyers would be filing multiple things simultaneously as much as possible to reduce lawyer fees. Trump’s goal isn’t to reduce cost though, it’s just to waste time. I’m not sure Trump has ever actually won a civil lawsuit historically, he just wastes time until people settle or drop it because they cannot afford to continue. He;'s trying to do the same here in the criminal trials and forcing them further towards election season so he can add to the perception the trials are about his campaign, and not the criminal activity itself.

      • @blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        And each of those timeframes have subsequent timeframes for response

        This theoretically gives someone immunity from legal consequences. And in trumps case the theory is put into practice. Because theres no cap on the number of subsequent timeframes. Every appeal decision can be appealed.

        • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          83 months ago

          There’s a cap. You can’t appeal past the Supreme Court. And sometimes courts don’t even take up your case. This Supreme Court has been surprisingly unwilling to do things for him.

          If they don’t take up the case, the appeal ends.

          • @snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            This Supreme Court has been surprisingly unwilling to do things for him.

            Trump didn’t pick his nominees, some group like the Heritage Club or whatever they are called had him nominate them. The nominees are not MAGA idiots, they are conservative authoritarians who wanted to overturn Roe v Wade and take away people’s rights. Now that they are on the court Trump can go fuck himself.

          • @blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            As far as ive seen, he can appeal laterally indefinitely, taken up by other appeals courts, or somehow through the same appeal court.

            And sometimes courts don’t even take up your case.

            This seems to be where the lack of standardization comes from. Its up to court discretion. Which is how someone like trump can get dozens of appeals while most only get 1.

    • @MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      193 months ago

      In a word, money. If you can afford it, there’s almost always another angle to try again. But most defendants aren’t bankrolled by the RNC and Russian oligarchs, and the only thing limiting him is how quickly they can draw up new motions.

    • @Conyak@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      There isn’t a set number of times a person can try this. It’s not the same as appealing a verdict. You can ask for a delay right up until trial starts if you present different reasons.

      • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Judges can also get tired of your shit and start imposing limits on your ability to file motions, and can also rule on them without awaiting a response.

  • @jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    233 months ago

    Oh damn, I didn’t realize that was starting Monday. I’ll have to swing by Costco to pickup some popcorn this weekend!