Bitwarden Authenticator is a standalone app that is available for everyone, even non-Bitwarden customers.

In its current release, Bitwarden Authenticator generates time-based one-time passwords (TOTP) for users who want to add an extra layer of 2FA security to their logins.

There is a comprehensive roadmap planned with additional functionality.

Available for iOS and Android

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, they’re both ostensibly open source and standalone. I’m an avid Bitwarden Free user, but Aegis has been my go-to for a long time.

      If it’s a standalone completely offline app, like Aegis, I’m at a loss to what they could offer that is any different than what Aegis already offers.

      • Simon Müller@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you look at the roadmap they have in the blogpost, they are apparently planning tighter integration with the existing bitwarden suite

      • fluckx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        2FA push is on the roadmap. Does aegis have that? Or am I just too dense to realise it does?

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean, Aegis is 2FA? That’s literally all it is? It generates One Time Pad codes for various sites and apps that support authentication apps.

          So, I’m not sure what you mean?

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not positive but I’m assuming they’re referring to a kind of MFA where the authenticating service pushes to the client you possess rather than relying on a temporal cryptographic key. I’ve got a few services which work that way

            • fluckx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s indeed what I meant. Similar to how OKTA, battle.net, or the Microsoft authenticator works( in corporate environments).

              You receive a push notification which asks if you’re trying to log in and approve it, followed by a fingerprint or a pin code to confirm, rather than having to type in the code generated by your app

    • cmhe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I used to use Aegis, but after setting up my own vaultwarden, I use the normal bitwarden app/plugin on all my systems for passwords and TOTP.

      The advantages are that I don’t need my phone to login, the keys are synced and backuped in the encrypted vaultwarden database, which I can then handle with normal server backup tools. It still works offline, because bitwarden app caches the password.

      This is IMO much more convenient and secure (in a way that loosing access to a device doesn’t shut you out, and you don’t need to trust third parties) then most other solutions.

      • pitninja@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Even if I hosted my own BitWarden vault, I wouldn’t put my passwords and 2 factor tokens in the same place because it’s eliminating the benefits that 2 factor provides if someone somehow manages to get into my vault.

        • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          2 factor came into our life because people were using same passwords everywhere. With unique passwords, which are easy with password managers, it’s rarely needed.

          • pitninja@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            That may have been part of the reason, but the theory behind MFA is that there are 3 primary ways to authenticate who you are: what you know (password), what you have (secure one time password generator or hardware token), and what you are (biometrics). Password managers and digital one time password generators have kind of blurred the lines between passwords and one time passwords, but you’re raising your risk a bit if you put them in the same place.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            With unique passwords, the attack surface just changes. Instead of attacking the passwords, attackers attack the password managers. LastPass, Okta, and Passwordstate each had breaches, and the first two are quite popular.

            That doesn’t mean Bitwarden is at risk (not sure if it has been targeted), it just means that attackers are finding success going after password managers, so they could go after Bitwarden. Maybe they’ll sneak in an xz-style bug that’ll allow attackers to steal credentials en-route, idk.

            So it’s a matter of good/better/best:

            • good - use a password manager to prevent password leaks from providing access to other accounts
            • better - use 2FA to prevent “password recovery” attacks; these are often targeted in nature, so there’s a lot less risk here
            • best - use a separate 2FA from your password manager to prevent a breach from exposing all of your accounts

            The overhead from using a separate 2FA app is pretty low, just make sure it encrypts your keys and you trust it (FOSS is a good indicator of trust).

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is not much difference between having two apps (password manager and authenticator app) or one app, that does both on the same device.

          So, if you want more security, then you have to deal with a hardware token and never with a authenticator app. But then if you loose your token, then you have trouble.

      • derpgon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think it caches the password. Rather a decryption key is derived from your password and is used to unlock the encrypted blob.

        • cmhe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          What I meant is that is caches the password database for offline use.