It’s the same as with Linux, GIMP, LibreOffice or OnlyOffice. Some people are so used to their routines that they expect everything to work the same and get easily pissed when not.

  • ShustOne@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well these tools are in Photoshop and not GIMP. You can’t just hand wave that away as not GIMPs fault.

    • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well its still not a image manipulation feature missing. It’s a workflow feature. You could also just copy a layer. But in the end, Photoshop has no image manipulation feature that is really missing in GIMP, you can export the same result picture.

        • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look at it like two cars. One is automatic and the other has a stick shift. In the end what I am talking about is the transportation. Both cars drive the same speed and arrive at the same time, but driving stick requires a different workflow, then driving automatic. But that does not mean, stick shift is no alternative to an automatic.

    • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Photoshop doesn’t have a native G’MIC plugin feature. You can’t wave that away as not Adobes fault!

      That’s how stupid you sound.

      Different products have different features and different ways to do things. It’s not Gimp’s sole purpose to just clone every feature from Photoshop. It’s not a Photoshop clone, it’s a piece of software in its own right.

      Gimp makes great use of the amazing G’Mic filter tool. Adobe doesn’t. That doesn’t make Gimp better than Photoshop.

      Different software makes different choices and people choose whichever they want to use and shut the hell up about it.