• coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        42
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t get the “launcher hate”. Yes, they’re not the most convenient, but I’m not playing in the launcher for hours.

        Currently I play moddedDragon Age Inquisition. The launch sequence is:

        Frosty Fix -> Frosty Manager -> Epic Games -> EA App -> Dragon Age.

        Takes a few seconds and I’m in the game.

        • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I dont hate them because theyre inconvenient. I hate them because there are so many of them. I don’t want more bloatware.

          Include the necessary binaries to access your servers in the game’s master executable, its not hard.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have several hundred games and a handful of launchers. I start one of them. Sometimes two when necessary. What’s the hassle?

            • WallEx@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Because of bloatware, which they wrote. Its not that hard. Might not be a problem for you, but that doesn’t say anything about others.

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              “Oh, cool. I don’t want my 6 different launchers to all start every time I turn on my computer, so I’ll only start the launcher that has the game I want to play, so long as I remember what launcher it is.”

              “Oh, awesome. I started the launcher. Now it’s showing 278GB worth of updates to download since I haven’t opened this one for a few months. Guess I’ll start playing tomorrow.”

              • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                Exactly, I’ll start the game shortcut which launches the needed game store and then the game, done. None of the apps is in auto-start.

                Updates are off course done via winget.

                Please stop making up problems where there aren’t any. I already do acknowledge that launchers and game stores aren’t an ideal solution. But they work fine.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I don’t get the “launcher apologists”. Yes, the companies insist on using their own, but I’m not willing to expend system resources on multiple badly made memory-hog software doing fuck-knows-what running simultaneously that I don’t even interact with.

        • Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          imagine a car company adding like another door or lock/2nd key you’d have to open/unlock every time. thats what those represent. we know the 95% of games don’t need it. now for ones like paradox interactive games that have mod playlists support and is mostly utilitarian (they do have a little banner ad space for dlc etc), hell yeah thats fine, but when their just gross multi layer ads, odd trophy points shops/weird 2nd store front that smack of walled garden ecosystem shit those can fuck right off.

          i mean im also someone who 99% of the time mod out intro/and dev splash screens to save seconds.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            Tl;dr

            It’s not a car company. It’s a PC that when it can run a game it can run a launcher simultaneously too.

            • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              And those extra launchers take up unnecessary resources and extra steps between you and the game.

              If I buy a game on one launcher, I should only have to deal with that launcher.

              • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I agree, launchers are one superfluous piece of software that require additional resources.

                Steam takes half a gig of RAM. From my 32 gigs available.

                Also around 1 or 1.5 gigs on my drive. Many games take 50 to 100 gigs.

                It’s a minor inconvenience. If one can’t afford one gig for a launcher how would a game be installed anyway?

                • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  It’s not just one launcher in a lot of cases. Many cases have you also run another launcher such as Ubisoft and EA games that require their launchers to run along side Steam. It all adds up and it doesn’t need to be that way nor does it need defending.

                  I don’t really understand why you’re defending something thats worse for you than the alternative.

                  • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I don’t defend the situation, I get along with it. Is it not possible for some people to have an issue with a product and still be able to use it?

                    Launchers aren’t perfect, not even Steam as the pack leader. But they’re a **minor inconvenience **.

                    I haven’t got a single game installed that uses nearly as few resources as all the launchers. Mass Effect LE alone is around 100 times bigger than Steam on my drive. That’s not bloatware, that’s a mini tool in comparison.

                    Curseforge/Overwolf takes less than 500 MB of RAM, when I launch Minecraft through it the game takes 20 times the amount.

                    Tell me where the problem is. If your computer can run and install the game it can do so with the launcher too. Some of us can deal with that even if it’s not a perfect situation.

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Except everyone wants to have their own launcher and they all want to register background services that chew up resources constantly and do god knows what.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            I currently have 8 stores installed and 1 (in words: one of them) runs a background task: Windows/XBox services. Come again.

            • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              You can take them off of the “launch on startup” list to make them not do that, but he said they “want” to, which is true.

              • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes, just like Discord and many other apps that are useful but annoying: You take them off autostart once.

                I don’t get why people would rather be angry all the time instead of just performing these five clicks once.

                • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It doesn’t stop being an issue just because you can brush it under the rug and ignore it.

                  The point is that the user shouldn’t have to work around these extra launchers. How about companies just stop pushing their own bloatware. If you buy a game through Steam, it should just require Steam. Same for GOG and all the others.

                  • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I don’t claim it’s not an issue and yes I can ignore it perfectly.

                    Compared to what amount of resources most modern games require, a launcher or store app needs a tiny fraction of that. The issue is overblown IMHO.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Also, once they discontinue the launcher there’s a fat chance the game will not start at all, like it happened with some games tied to M$ Games for Windows live

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            5 months ago

            I paid 5€ for all three Mass Effects and another 5 for DA:Inquisition.

            How long am I considered to “own” that before I can let go for good because I got my money’s worth?

            I won’t ever play them a second time, so I gain nothing from games hogging my game library.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Ever, because you fucking bought them? Same way if you buy a car, a house, a pacifier…

              • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Again, I got to play four AAA games for the price of a movie ticket. How many lifetimes do I have to “own” these games?

                I think I got my money’s worth out of the deal. Four big games for a tenner and people are still like "but you don’t really own them ". Yes, I know. It’s more like a very long rental.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          For the majority of users, launchers are not only unnecessary but also an unnecessary privacy and security risk, imo. They’re running administrative privileges while in the background the entire time, when they only really need to be run for updates. That said, it’s not a dealbreaker for me, either, I just don’t like these companies in general.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            The only time any launcher ever had administrator-like rights is while updating. Don’t know why you would run them as admin.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s literally what the launchers do, they try check for updates every time you start the game. It’s going to prompt for admin rights every time a windows user runs it, without fail. How many of them run with no errors without the rights given, I’m not sure.

              • Perfide@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s going to prompt for admin rights every time a windows user runs it

                I can personally confirm: No, it does not.

                • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Bro.

                  It’s not gonna prompt after it finds out there are updates to install.

                  Are you dudes installing things to AppData, lmao?

                  • Perfide@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Are you dudes installing things to AppData, lmao?

                    Most of my things aren’t even installed on the same drive as AppData.

        • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well… That’s like alot of steps, lol. In UX design, we would call that a violation of the Three Click rule, and obfuscating the expression of user intent.

          Like… Do you gain anything from these launchers? I guess Frosty you opt into because you use it to manage your mods. Maybe launching through that is how your mods get bootstrapped. Kay cool.

          Epic games, you definitely need and want to use for other reasons-- Shopping for games and managing your library-- but is it really benefitting you to open that app so that you can open the app you actually want to use? Maybe you have a reason that you actually like that better, idk, but I’d rather just open the app that I want.

          And then the EA app… What does it offer that makes it worth putting another step between you and your game? Login to the EA account you don’t need? DRM? Ads for other games? The premise of most launchers is that the company has some goals that you don’t share, and they’re willing to add friction to your experience to achieve those.

          Some launchers aren’t so bad. I dunno what EA’s deal is. Speaking of Ubisoft Connect specifically:

          • It’s an online-only service that forces you into having an account to play… It’s not just an extra launcher in front of your game
          • Ubisoft Connect is part of their DRM mechanism
          • It wants admin privileges on your system
          • It leaves processes running in the background when you aren’t using it
          • And more

          Those things aren’t necessarily all bad per se, and you’d certainly tolerate them for some apps… But it’s a big imposition for the company to insist on, IMO, and part of the reason for the launcher hate.

          I didn’t downvote btw, I think you’re entitled to your opinion and maybe you’re fine with the launchers you use… But personally, I just choose not to play Ubisoft games for that reason, even though there are games that I would like to have played.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            When playing modded games some rules of good practice don’t apply because of jank. It’s in the nature of things that aren’t designed to be modified. Specifically for my DA:I installation I count about 5 clicks and the game is launched. Compared to the hundreds of clicks in the game itself it’s a tiny inconvenience.

            But to be clear once more: I never claimed launchers and game or app stores are an ideal solution, especially concerning their abundance and varying quality.

            I want to play a certain game that requires a launcher, then I’ll either get that launcher or I won’t play the game.

        • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sorry you upset the hive mind buddy. You’re absolutely right, but there are tons of people out there that can’t even handle literal seconds of inconvenience. It’s just not that big of a deal.

          • coffinwood@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh thanks for the kind answer. I don’t care about Internet clout. This isn’t Reddit, I can live with 13 downvotes. :D