• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No it is not, a 19/18 year old is A) not a child, and B) those numbers are from COVID as I have explained already. People couldn’t drive, so that lowered the deaths which historically have been the number one thing, and suicides went up.

    Once numbers for 2023/post COVID are released it’ll be back to cars being the number one cause.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      19/18 year old is A) not a child

      So these teenagers you speak about, you think they’re not children?

      Let me guess, you’re like 20-23?

      Yes, 18 and 19 year old are non-fully developed humans. Still developing. Not finished. SO MUCH SO, that they CAN AREN’T VENE ALLOWED BEER.

      It’s so pathetic the excuses you keep making to try and spin a horrible fact into something that doesn’t need to be worried about.

      Like compared to Europe, America really is on the level of developing countries, and even worse in a lot of instances.

      https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting-data/gun-violence-united-states-outlier

      Science agrees that gun control works. It’s just a fact. A fact you won’t be able to accept, no matter what.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        So these teenagers you speak about, you think they’re not children?

        No they’re not, most gang related violence here in the states is from 15-19 year olds. Which heavily skew the numbers.

        Let me guess, you’re like 20-23?

        Lol try again kid, I’m probably old enough to be your father.

        Yes, 18 and 19 year old are non-fully developed humans. Still developing. Not finished. SO MUCH SO, that they CAN AREN’T VENE ALLOWED BEER.

        Is that why they’re allowed alcohol in most of Europe at that age?

        It’s so pathetic the excuses you keep making to try and spin a horrible fact into something that doesn’t need to be worried about.

        Well considering that 2/3rds (%66~) of our deaths are suicides, then of the 34% left, 85% of those are gang/drug related, and then the last %15 covers police killings (on average 1k deaths a year from the police shooting someone) and then you have the few hundred murders a year from firearms that includes (mass shootings, robberies, muggings, random acts of violence). But you wouldn’t know this because you’re from a euro country who thinks guns magically make the usa the wild west and blood pours from the streets daily while roaming hordes or mass murders just walk around openly and execute people.

        Like compared to Europe, America really is on the level of developing countries, and even worse in a lot of instances.

        Yea you don’t know what you’re talking about.

        Science agrees that gun control works. It’s just a fact. A fact you won’t be able to accept, no matter what.

        Science agrees that counties that have social programs that support their citizens have less violence overall… Brazil still is waiting on your “gun control works”…

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          from 15-19 year olds. no, they’re not children

          Keep shifting the goal post to younger and younger?

          If you’re even close my age, that’s fucking sad man. If you’ve gotten over the age of 35 and still think it’s okay when kids die because they’re teenagers, live in bad areas (and are usually minorities), then… how the fuck do you sleep at night?

          The mental gymnastics is goddamn impressive.

          Is that why they’re allowed alcohol in most of Europe at that age?

          The age of consent is on average 16, and in lots of countries you may have a light alcohol beverage with a meal if accompanied by your guardians. Just like with your driving licences. A “learner’s permit” if you will, because we understand that these are kids on the verge of adulthood, so they’re gradually allowed to do more and more adult things. You can have a mild drink with a meal at 16, buy yourself drinks at a bar and purchase wines and milds from stores at 18 and when you’re 20, no limits anymore. You can drive a <11kW bike at 16, a <25kW at 18 and any power at 20. Because again, developing, so gradually ease them in so they’re ready when they’re fully-grown as opposed to being a developing young human being.

          People’s brains don’t even fully mature until they’re ~26, but you try to shirk responsibility of children getting slaughtered with an excuse of “well most of them are older kids who live in poor socioeconomic areas, so why would their deaths matter”.

          Like I said, there’s never any science with you people, always the same chants of “not kids”, “muh rights” (a right to a gun isn’t a human right) and “but then only criminals will have guns” and you never ever read any of the science on the matter.

          my whataboutism is still waiting

          No shit? You’re too thick to read a simple summary from Harvard and you excuse the leading cause of children being guns as “most of them are black teens so they’re criminals anyway so who cares”, so why would you accept science concerning your shitty “what about”?

          Here’s a summary of the OXFORD UNIVERSITY study I have linked several times:

          Santaella-Tenorio’s study (co-authored with Columbia professors Magdalena Cerdá and Sandro Galea, as well as the University of North Carolina’s Andrés Villaveces) examined roughly 130 studies that had been conducted in 10 different countries. Each of those 130 studies had looked at some specific change in gun laws and its effect on homicide and/or suicide rates. Most of them looked at law changes in the developed world, such as the US, Australia, and Austria, while a few looked at gun laws in developing countries, specifically Brazil and South Africa.

          ###“… SPECIFICALLY BRAZIL …”

          So why don’t you actually read the fucking thing? Just like I’ve been saying all along, you’re nothing but a willfully ignorant gun nut parroting propaganda you’ve overheard, and you never ever have a single piece of peer reviewed study to support your regurgitated bullshit.

          Also, you want to know about the reasons for South American instability and crime? How about a look in the mirror?

          https://www.cepr.net/how-us-guns-destabilize-latin-america-and-fuel-the-refugee-crisis/

          In August, the Mexican government sued US gunmakers for facilitating the high gun homicide rate in Mexico. Most people in the US who heard this news were probably confused, not understanding what US gunmakers have to do with homicides in Mexico. If they were to read Ioan Grillo’s excellent book, Blood Gun Money: How America Arms Gangs and Cartels, they would understand completely. They would learn that Mexican law enforcement estimates that 2.5 million guns have been smuggled from the United States into Mexico over the past decade. They might even wonder why other countries in Latin America aren’t also suing US gunmakers

          The Americas is the most homicidal region on the planet due, in no small part, to the “iron river” of guns flowing from the United States to Latin America and the Caribbean. The above figure from Our World in Data, based on data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, shows that Canada had a gun homicide rate of 0.5 deaths per 100,000 in 2017. In the US, the rate was 4.63, approaching 10 times the rate in Canada, while in Mexico, it was 11.49, more than 20 times the Canada rate. Excluding the Americas, all countries in Europe, and most countries in the rest of the world had lower gun homicide rates than the US. (Some people incorrectly believe that there is a higher rate of gun ownership in Canada than in the US, but the Small Arms Survey reports that in 2017 Canada had 34.7 guns per 100 residents, compared to 120.5 in the United States. The gun ownership rate in the US is more than three times the rate in Canada.)

          Although how would you ever read a book on the matter, when a page long summary gives you trouble.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So nitpicking it is. (also it’s odd that the Surgeon General is making a statement in 2024 that doesn’t use any data newer than 2020 - so odd, that I doubt your claim is correct.)

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Making a statement in 2024 does not mean you used data from 2024…the year isnt even over, so no the data is not from 2024.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Making a statement in 2024 does not mean you used data from 2024…the year isnt even over, so no the data is not from 2024.

          Please quote where I said the data was from 2024.

          B) those numbers are from COVID as I have explained already

          Covid was 2020. I’m doubtful the 2024 report is based entirely on numbers from 2020. I didn’t look, and I doubt you did. But I’m doubtful, as I said.

          In any case, it’s a tragic statistic regardless of that, and also no matter whether we’re cutting off “children” at 18 or 19 - and that’s a pretty sickening reason to handwave it away. Deaths are deaths, and these are our youth.

          Same with this BS:

          Once numbers for 2023/post COVID are released it’ll be back to cars being the number one cause.

          Do you not recognize how asinine it is to hinge your argument on this? Let’s say it’s the number 2 cause of death. Hell, let’s say it’s the number three cause of death.

          We have a problem and all some folks can do is nitpick about irrelevant bullshit that would not detract from the argument even if I accepted all the nitpicks.

          Anyhow, I somehow missed this bit of classic internet snark, so you can fuck off with this dismissive and inaccurate ad hom:

          Let me guess, you’re like 20-23?

          I was getting OUT of the military longer ago than that, which is why I can recognize that 19 is a child in all ways that are relevant to their likely level of maturity, and the tragedy of their deaths, plus be appropriately horrified at the continual resistance to doing anything at all about it.

          Good Day, Sir.

          Edit -

          Not that it matters at all except to folks who want to deflect from the problem, but here’s the press release that accompanies that 2024 report.

          It cites this source, among others, and I’m sure if I wasn’t too lazy to crawl the actual PDF I’d find others: https://wonder.cdc.gov/Deaths-by-Underlying-Cause.html

          In any case, if deflection, denial, and ad hom attacks are all you got, I see no reason to continue.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Please quote where I said the data was from 2024.

            You posted an image acting like because it said 2024 that the data is from 2024. Don’t act like you weren’t trying anything else.

            Covid was 2020. I’m doubtful the 2024 report is based entirely on numbers from 2020. I didn’t look, and I doubt you did. But I’m doubtful, as I said.

            I did look, most reports take years to be published because of the amount of data that’s available. Usually its 4ish years old by the time it’s released. This is just the nature of these reports. Its why the studies from 2015/2016 where the last ones prior to seeing the 2020/21 studies get released.

            In any case, it’s a tragic statistic regardless of that, and also no matter whether we’re cutting off “children” at 18 or 19 - and that’s a pretty sickening reason to handwave it away. Deaths are deaths, and these are our youth.

            It’s not, it’s nuance that’s being lost. The public hears kids, they think 5 year olds being killed, not a gang member who just had beef with another gang member who’s now dead.

            Do you not recognize how asinine it is to hinge your argument on this? Let’s say it’s the number 2 cause of death. Hell, let’s say it’s the number three cause of death.

            It’s not, suicide is the main cause of that number. Are you going to feel better because you put in a law that somehow magically stops people from offing themselves with a firearm but the suicide numbers don’t drop they just use another tool? Will you stand up and call it a win then? Or will you realize that we have a problem with our society and our citizens need social support and reform first. One of those options will drastically reduce our violence and suicides…the other will not.

            We have a problem and all some folks can do is nitpick about irrelevant bullshit that would not detract from the argument even if I accepted all the nitpicks.

            I never said we don’t have an issue. I’ve merely stated that guns aren’t our issue and I’ve given solutions that will actually work, I’m not the one nitpicking things. Anti-2a groups are.

            Anyhow, I somehow missed this bit of classic internet snark, so you can fuck off with this dismissive and inaccurate ad hom:

            Let me guess, you’re like 20-23?

            I was getting OUT of the military longer ago than that, which is why I can recognize that 19 is a child in all ways that are relevant to their likely level of maturity, and the tragedy of their deaths, plus be appropriately horrified at the continual resistance to doing anything at all about it.

            Good Day, Sir.

            I don’t know how you got comments mixed up but you’re thinking of some other user. I never questioned your age, this user did.

            https://lemmy.world/comment/11054266

            Not that it matters at all except to folks who want to deflect from the problem, but here’s the press release that accompanies that 2024 report.

            This is the report that cites the 2020/21 numbers.

            It cites this source, among others, and I’m sure if I wasn’t too lazy to crawl the actual PDF I’d find others: https://wonder.cdc.gov/Deaths-by-Underlying-Cause.html

            Yea which cites COVID numbers as I’ve previously stated.

            In any case, if deflection, denial, and ad hom attacks are all you got, I see no reason to continue.

            I’m not deflecting anything, and I’ve not denied anything either, and the attacks are not from me as I’ve pointed out, you must have copied that other users comments thinking they were mine.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              You posted an image acting like because it said 2024 that the data is from 2024. Don’t act like you weren’t trying anything else.

              Please. I posted it because it would be stupid for the surgeon general to stop looking at data in 2020 for a statement released in 2024. (and that’s exactly what I said in my comment with the picture)

              And indeed I see a lot of citations with later dates than 2020. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/firearm-violence-advisory.pdf

              I’ve merely stated that guns aren’t our issue and I’ve given solutions that will actually work, I’m not the one nitpicking things. Anti-2a groups are.

              Not in reply to me you didn’t.

              I never questioned your age, this user did.

              Whoops.