✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧

  • 81 Posts
  • 181 Comments
Joined 7 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2024年3月12日

help-circle

  • “You do not mention the path of the electron at all, Heisenberg. But yet when you look in a cloud chamber the electron’s track can be observed quite directly.” “Don’t you think that it’s strange to say that there is a path for the electron in the cloud chamber, but there is no path for the electron in the atom?” ~Einstein

    Yeah weird it would then be pure probability with no causes when it’s inside the atom because that’s what matches the mathematical framework of Quantum Physics while when it’s in a cloud chamber ITS EXACT LOCATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. So yeah I’m with reality instead of that mathematical framework and don’t see any issue with the same concept of ‘having a form’ applying to entanglement ~which 100% blows up Bell’s theorem before it gets to multilocation.

    Bell’s Theorem —> 💥

    Possibility of Hidden Variables —> 👍



  • I disagree. “Einstein once said it was silly to think an electron is in an undetermined state until measured when he can see it’s path in a cloud chamber.” I am definitely of the einstein view and not the mainstream quantum scientist view. According to me, things, like einstein’s electron DO have actual states when not ‘observed’ and do not need to ‘be observed and collapse in to a form at that time’. At every point in it’s path thru that cloud chamber the electron has it’s form WHICH IS SUPEROBVIOUS TO SEE even tho the quantum math has no idea what to do about it and is like ‘no does not fit in the math thus cannot exist’. In reality, the electron does not need to be measured to have it’s form. Same with the ‘entangled’ particles Bell uses. Just because it is measured later does not mean it did not have it’s form while not measured ~which is common sense to me and blows up Bell’s Theorem before even having to reach to exotic theories. Weird to me stuff like that is not common sense. But I personally think quantum physics went wrong waaaaaay at the start and is riddled with exotic theories based on good data but faulty definitions and conclusions (such as the doubleslit experiment being touted as ‘a single photon being let thru’ when it’s a guy shining a very dim light for a month and taking a slow exposure pic. Shining light for 1 month = 1 Photon. Does not match common sense. Throws off future work. But is definitionwise accurate as quanta is ‘a level of energy’). So meh. Disagree. Nice you know your stuff tho.


  • Just adding to this: any modern arguments using the probabilistic nature of quantum phenomena to fight determinism are wrong. Einstein made a theory called ‘hidden variable theory’ saying there were causes we couldn’t see (duh). A guy named Bell ‘proved it wrong’ by arguing against something einstein said in it about data being in multiple places simultaneously. Had nothing to do with whether hidden variables exist. But the headlines were ‘hidden variable theory proved wrong’ implying to the public that there are somehow no causes of things below a certain level and that an illogical foundation of ‘probability’ somehow underlies everything. Einstein once said it was silly to think an electron is in an undetermined state until measured when he can see it’s path in a cloud chamber. It clearly is a thing constantly existing.

    With the errors of the foundational days of quantum physics out of the way, how can one argue against a thought or action having causes preceding it? Even if we are in woowoo land where everyone is spirits with minds existing separately in different worlds, there are still variables determining what those minds think. Only seeming alternative explanation so far is the faulty quantum probability field… which is wrong.




  • haha I just small talk to appease social standards. In my ideal reality, intelligent beings are creating and doing greater things themselves every day and viewing it like a wasted day if they have not. I could, right now, talk about my design decisions I’m coding in to this editor today and what some of the plans are for it as of now. I wouldn’t talk about Why I’m focusing on the editor before the game because I’ve already been over that so there would be little gain for the ultimate quality of what I’m making in that conversation. And, with my ideal type of person, the conversation could easily drift in to what groundbreaking realms they are in too. It should be like this every day for an individual to be considered healthy. Comparatively, small talk is a waste meant to give vocalization options to beings fulfilling low to medium potential roles that cannot enter any realm of novelty themselves ~followers that cannot be waymakers. I know I say this in a realm of 90% people who are just fulfilling a low potential role while otherwise ‘passing the time’, just like the person in the post. So downvote me. You know it’s true tho and it isn’t the smalltalkers who are the next feynmans, einsteins, etc. Where do you aim for yourself? ‘passing the time’ ‘smalltalk’ level or higher?












  • for me it was exactly what cloudless said. The most info I felt comfortable giving was that I’m in the western hemisphere, and I have my own culture and cultures of internet places I frequent. The physical area culture is not what I would be proud of so I would not show the world it’s mine, because I do not consider it mine. I would answer: it is the personal nature of your challenge. ‘We’ don’t want personal. ‘We’ want challenges where we don’t have to consider social ramifications of what we choose to make.

    ‘make a trex’ would have resulted in people making trexs.

    ‘share your location’ requires a step of ‘hmmm do i want to share this about myself and how much?’ Why have steps like that that weed wouldbe contestants out at all?




  • prompt was: ((((mecha polar bear With cannons and lasers)))) megaboss absolute boss (((absolutely beautiful))) (((towering))) (((imopsing))) (((intimidating))) chaos carnage (((power))) (((wtf))) (((extremely powerful))) (((legendary))) (((((war))))) ((masterpiece)) ((illustration)) ((best quality))

    yes imopsing instead of imposing, lol. I had actually tried a bunchon SD1.5 for this and kept getting the type you are talking about like this:

    so i moved the prompt to various SDXL models and, without anything else, they became anthropomorphized robot polarbears like you see in the main image. So, in answer, SD version and Model determined that ~not prompt.



  • don’t worry about it. When I got here merde was verbally assaulting me as, if you stay a while, you will see he does to others, and every time he would submit his weekly entry, right then mine would get a downvote and be, with moopoos, the only downvoted entry. It is called bullying and, unlike the rikudoosage guy who deleted his post and stopped posting recently when merde attacked him instead of merde convey himself politely, I struck back, leadership became involved, and that screenshot is my first submission that was not instantly downvoted when merde posted his each week. Yeah my history shouldn’t show anything because that was ancient and I thought over. Apparently not tho and requires blocking because I don’t come here to fight. This is also the last I will talk about him so don’t worry if you don’t understand; it’s just ‘he said she said’ from your perspective. just look back on this when you see him attack someone. I’m the one that lived.

    Anyway, i played a game the other night where someone was all in to infighting, so I blocked them, again the energy was good, was able to do a surprise victory, and even the blocked guy gave me a thumbs up afterward. I can’t stand bullying and, if anything, the main issue I see with myself as mod is I would be overprotective, which is why my areas are places of peace where no one is attacked. Can’t stand it. So blocked, now the environment is a little brighter, and here’s to another 7 months of peace :)