• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The problem is that when you do help people, more people keep showing up who want help too. There’s a good reason why a couple hundred thousand migrants have come to NYC (where I live) and that isn’t because there’s no “fucking safety net”. Frankly, I want less of a safety net here so that these people leave and the rest of the country has to do its share. I feel absolutely no guilt saying that I want either those benches a person can’t lie down on or no benches at all in the public areas I go to.

    There are help-the-homeless-even-more advocates in NYC so I’m not saying everyone is a hypocrite, but I expect that the overlap between “complains about measures to deter homeless people” and “lives in a neighborhood with a lot of homeless people” is small.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The problem is that when you do help people, more people keep showing up who want help too.

      Which is why if it happens on a federal level, then people don’t congregate in the few places that aren’t as worse as possible.

      If we handle it on a city or even state level, then people spit out by the worst states will always migrate, subsidizing the cost of the policies for those shitty states. And providing the incentive to be as cruel as possible.

      That’s the thing with the logic against it, you end up arguing that it should be done on a federal level and agreeing with the person you’re arguing with.

      Always worth the time for a reply tho. Hopefully it sticks.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree that it should happen on a federal level, although I don’t think it will as long as cities like New York and San Francisco are paying for it. I’m arguing against people who think that New York and San Francisco shouldn’t be creating any public areas that aren’t for homeless people.

    • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s always some place that’s worse. What you’re arguing for here is a race to the bottom, where everyone tries to be worse than their neighbours in order to get the undesirables to go there instead.

      In essentially “the tragedy of the commons” but in an opposite sense. If everyone gets worse in an attempt to get rid of “undesirables”, you just end up with everywhere being worse, and the “undesirables” still being around. What we need is for everyone to build safety nets together. That might actually improve the situation.

      • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        We need a system that does not rely on threats of homelessness to motivate people.

        As it is there will always be undesirables, even if the have/get to move the goalposts.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        2 months ago

        I recognize that this is a tragedy-of-the-commons scenario (although if everywhere is worse then at least people will stop coming from other countries to be homeless in the USA) but local action can’t prevent the race. It can only determine winners and losers.

        • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nobody is coming to the US to be homeless. That’s not a thing.

          We’re shitty enough to our own citizens to make plenty of our own folk homeless.

          You are closer to living on the street than you realize.

          • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Nobody is coming to the US to be homeless. That’s not a thing.

            They don’t intend to stay homeless permanently, but they come with no money and use the social services available to homeless people.

            We’re shitty enough to our own citizens to make plenty of our own folk homeless.

            There are many hard-working poor people who experience temporary housing insecurity, but they’re not the ones living on the street long-term. The ones who are usually have serious mental problems that make becoming a productive member of even the most generous society very unlikely. (They’ll also often refuse to go to a shelter because they won’t be allowed to do drugs there.)

            You are closer to living on the street than you realize.

            My family was poor when I was a child, although government assistance made it possible for us to pay for a place to live. (Note that I am not opposed to all government assistance.) We were close to homelessness then, and I really don’t want to end up in that situation again so I have taken many precautions. I have enough savings to live on for a long time. If I lose those, I have six people (mostly relatives) who would let me live with them for as long as I needed to. If they don’t, I have four more who would let me live with them for a few weeks. I think I could only become homeless if I got addicted to drugs or developed a mental illness that made me unbearable to be around. That’s not impossible but it is unlikely.

            • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think I could only become homeless if I got addicted to drugs or developed a mental illness that made me unbearable to be around. That’s not impossible but it is unlikely.

              Please say this is self-deprecating irony.

              • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It’s funny that my views are apparently extremely unpopular around here because they seem fairly mainstream IRL even among my friends who are all going to vote for Harris. I don’t think I would offend anyone by saying something similar at a group dinner (though some people might disagree) but I would be a little more circumspect and feel out the audience first if there were people I didn’t know. Different bubbles, I suppose…

                  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I don’t think helping people is a bad thing. I’m generally in favor of a relatively high level of help (I vote for centrist Democrats, not Republicans) but I think that sometimes it is justified and appropriate to help less rather than more.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              The answer to the mentally ill homeless problem is not enshittification of cities, it’s the creation of high quality government run long term care facilities with approprate action taken against those who abuse the residents in these facilities.

              Which is helping more. It will also be cheaper than enshittification in the long run. But you liberals will never understand that sometimes you have to actually spend money on social programs instead of running to the right whenever the republicans say boo.

              All your arguments are running to the right. Reagan would have been proud.

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh god forbid we create a society where thousands of people don’t need help!