Windows will no longer have an integrated basic rich-text-based word app.

  • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    224
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wordpad always seemed like an annoying and unnecessary half-step between notepad and word to me.

        • Mike D.@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is my most common use. It is grrat for opening large log files on servers.

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            The holy spirit help you with your servers that run on windows.

            I’d also suppose this update won’t affect you, cuz you’re hopefully not running latest win11 on a server.

        • davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          In the nineties it produced the cleanest .rtf output of all the editors. Word makes toxic .rtf that unnecessarily turns formatting off and on at every line break and elsewhere too.

          If it weren’t for wordpad I wouldn’t have learned how to output .rtf from my code.

          RIP WordPad.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      its pretty neat if you dont have access to word, which is likely why they want to get rid of it

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        Doubtful. There are a myriad of free and FOSS options that are available right now to people of even limited technological skill. WordPad isn’t damaging their bottom line, but since it’s certainly not adding to it, there’s no point in maintaining it.

        • reksas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thing about wordpad at least for me is that its just there if you need to make quick document that doesnt have to be as specificially made as you need to use word, but still more nice looking than just using notepad. You also dont need word to read stuff made with it.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was very niche, but it’s great for viewing docs or other light work on a system you don’t want to install a whole office suite onto.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can still do that but it’s through word webview. Some people won’t like that option.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t want to install “word webview” on a server in order to look at a large log file or peruse some XML.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You don’t, it’s a browser. You shouldn’t be doing anything interacting from a server anyways.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You shouldn’t be doing anything interacting from a server anyways.

              Ideally no but in the real world it happens, especially with with Windows Servers.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can’t say I ever needed it in the 28 years I’ve been using Windows. I’m sure there are plenty who did, though.

      • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I used it all the time to save text temporarily in. Note worked too, but i like the line break that WordPad had. It made reading and formatting easier.

    • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      As others have said, fast opening quick notes with basic formatting.

      For example, if I get an unexpected call I need to write down more than a call back number, Wordpad was my go to.

      Well, at least when back when I used Windows regularly.

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is there anything left to microsoft that makes sense at this point? Maybe the physical doors to the microsoft offices still function… after you watch an ad?

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was created for people to open Word docs at home before everyone had Office.

  • comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Microsoft: We can’t spy on your usage when you use wordpad, use O365 instead! (guessing since MS recommends using O365 Word in its place).

    TBH, I haven’t used wordpad since Windows 98. Not saying others don’t use it, but Notepad++ and a myriad of other options are better anyway.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You wouldn’t add AI to a hand bag?! You wouldn’t add AI to a car?! You wouldn’t add AI to a baby?! You wouldn’t shoot a police man?! … and then steal his helmet?! … and then add AI to it?!

      • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I do not like to add AI.

        I would not like it here or there.

        I would not like it anywhere.

        I would not add it in a handbag.

        I would not, could not, in a car.

        Not to a baby, not to a helmet.

        Not in my house, Not on a mouse.

        I do not like to add AI.

        I do not now, nor ever will I.

        Do you hear me Microsoft?

        Take your AI and fuck off.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Could they please retire modern Windows UI design?

    Those contrasting color squares are not the zen those designers think. UI layout being different in paradigm for every application is not the productivity improvement they think. Using titlebars for something other than titles and control buttons is not optimization. Those buttons being some scratches on the screen barely visible is crap from any PoV I can imagine.

    And somebody should explain to them that a good design for a billboard, a good design for a glossy magazine, a good design for a shop front, a good design for an office, a good design for a videogame, a good design for a movie and a good design for a workstation are all mutually incompatible in vast majority of cases.

    And again about zen, simplicity, air and all that. I understand they think they are very smart and understanding of aesthetics. But zen would be having clean window borders and clearly visible control elements, for starters. And buttons not being just color squares. And in general solutions being subordinate to functional goals of the UI being usable. Industrial ergonomics are zen.

    EDIT: I know it’s offtopic, not interested - keep walking

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        It just pains me to see, remember Chinese websites and software around 2007-2008?

        Everybody (aware) looked at that with terror.

        Now it’s the same everywhere.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember a while back Microsoft did an market research thing and found that of their brands, “Xbox” had positive consumer feedback while many of their other product names weren’t nearly as favorable.

      So what did they do? Did they try to understand what Xbox did differently to leverage that strategy elsewhere? Did they promote the Xbox marketing team to give them a wider purview?

      No. They just renamed Zune Music to Xbox Music and Games for Windows to Xbox for Windows. THAT’LL FIX IT!

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The drop-down text menu with dense options was good design. Adding the quick toolbar for more common tasks was also good design.

      Moving everything from the text menu to the quick toolbar was bad design.

      Just like the evolution of their search functionality. Started as an explorer feature (good), added to the start menu with a focus on program names (good), then they mixed web results from Bing and it’s unclear if a program I’m searching for is installed and it found that or if it exists and the result is a link to some website (bad, if I wanted to search the fucking internet, I’d launch a fucking browser), also insisting on using their browser (wtf, they should have been broken up 20 fucking years ago, instead the courts decided to just fucking ignore them doing the same shit they lost the lawsuit for only much worse now).

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh get fucked Microsoft. Now I have to use notepad when I put the tape measure on the spacebar so teams doesn’t change my status to idle.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wordpad, as I recall, only existed because back in the Windows 95 days nobody had Office and couldn’t open Word documents.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      WordPad in Windows 95 was a demonstration of how to use the rich-text editing component built into Windows. Its C++ source code came bundled with MFC (Microsoft Foundation Classes - programming library for making Windows apps using C++) as a sample.

      The fact that it was a useful tool for end users was essentially just a side effect.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I didn’t mind having something light and built in for when I just wanted quickly to create a little rich text doc and not boot up full fat Word and the corresponding jump in resource usage and file size.

  • b0rg_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    here’s a little known fact about WordPad: It was Microsoft’s first word processing program. Originally introduced as an add-on to MS-DOS in 1981, WordPad later became a part of Windows in the 1990s after the release of Windows 95. It was designed to be simpler and more user-friendly than its more advanced counterpart, Microsoft Word.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      WordPad didn’t exist until Windows 95. You might be thinking of Microsoft Write, which predated it.

      • ADTJ@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        In Windows 95, wordpad was still write.exe, is it possible they just renamed it?

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Definitely possible, but I think WordPad in Windows 95 was written from scratch.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still on the last windows os am ever gonna use windows 10

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you don’t plan to upgrade even after security updates end, what’s keeping you there now?

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Am prob gonna use linux fully and secondary os macos (not 100% sure erm) I also meant like windows oses

        • theherk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair enough. If you do run MacOS, I highly recommend UTM for running guest OS’s. It uses qemu and I have really found it to be even nicer than parallels.

  • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve used windows since the 90s. Not once have I intentionally used WordPad.

    It did open by default for some file types for a long time (.doc), usually mangling the content cause it couldn’t actually handle them properly. I think it was also the default for .txt files at some point, causing many curse words when editing plain text files, that invisibly weren’t so plain any more after… Programs expecting a configuration fine really don’t like that sort of thing.

    So: I’m very ok with this. Just install LibreOffice or something if you needa Word-like experience. Install notepad++ for anything “plain”.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    And so the bloodline of windows write is extinguished

    This is kinda sad that if you want to do even basic word processing with Microsoft software, your only option now is an ongoing subscription to do so.

    • spamspeicher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      …your only option now is an ongoing subscription to do so.

      You can also still buy the Office package without subscription. The latest release is from 2024 and 2021 before that. But of course its expensive for basic stuff.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I didn’t actually realise that, I thought they’d just gone full Adobe with office 365

        • Technofrood@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m fairly sure they want to, they keep trying to kill off the standalone version but always seem to keep giving it a reprieve.

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Word pad the goat of somehow interpreting files as not UTF8