• @fluckx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    343 hours ago

    What could go wrong when you let an ad company dictate the browser standards/rules.

    I know we have Firefox and some forks like librewolf, but percentage wise it feels like a lost battle ( even if I am on Firefox ).

    If only people switched en masse to Firefox for the ad blocker. Wouldn’t that be something… One big collective FU to Google.

    Oh well. One can dream I guess.

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    406 hours ago

    And what? If someone can live with ads, they can stay. Otherwise anyone can install Firefox. I was all-in Google since the beginning of Gmail. And switching to Firefox was completely painless. Everything works the same, times of website incompatibility are long gone.

    • @Integrate777
      link
      English
      41 hour ago

      What if websites decide that chrome users earn much more ad revenue and start forcing users to switch with those “This website only supports Chrome” error messages? What if this practice gets popular? I’m sure there are ways to get around it, but the average users who bothered switching to Firefox at all, will just conclude that anything except chrome has a bad browsing experience.

    • @pearsaltchocolatebar
      link
      English
      586 hours ago

      Because Google is trying to turn the internet into a walled garden where only people with Chrome can visit the majority of websites.

      • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        146 hours ago

        I’ve been been a full time Firefox user for three years now. Haven’t experience a single problem like that. Haven’t really experienced any problem at all to be honest

        • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          156 hours ago

          Unfortunately that has not been the case for me. Some sites for buying concert tickets don’t seem to like Firefox.

          I’ve had problems with several Microsoft sites we use internally for work ever since Edge went to Chrome.

          It’s not Firefox’s fault. Mozilla is abiding by web standards.

          • Ghoelian
            link
            fedilink
            English
            135 hours ago

            If you find any websites that don’t work with firefox, you should report them to Mozilla. Firefox has a list of known bad websites, and has fixes for them, usually just a user agent override.

        • @pearsaltchocolatebar
          link
          English
          56 hours ago

          Your past experiences with Firefox are irrelevant because we’re talking about the future.

          • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            I know. My experience with Chrome used to be good too. And we all know what’s up now.

            If Firefox fucks up, I’m fine with abandoning ship and moving on to the next thing. I’m not sure what that would be, but I’m sure I’ll figure that out once we get there.

            • @pearsaltchocolatebar
              link
              English
              75 hours ago

              That’s the problem. Google is working so that there’s not going to be a next thing.

              • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 hours ago

                That is concerning, but Internet Explorer used to be the only option too. Of course things are different now, but I have faith (for lack of anything else).

                • @pearsaltchocolatebar
                  link
                  English
                  14 hours ago

                  That was for a different reason, though. That was Microsoft forcing you to use their software on something you owned. A website can say, “you have to use chrome to access our site,” and that’s not antitrust behavior on the part of Google.

            • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Thats the thing.

              There is basically no alternative. Firefox exists on the mercy of google which is its biggest donor.

              There are very few attempts at a truly open source browser and neither can tackle the biggest problem, which is google pushing websites to adopt their standards, weaponizing ad income to guarantee compliance.

              Currently more then 80% of internet users have a chromium browser while websites creation for many entities is often outsourced out of lack of own IT knowledge. When firefox dies there will be no economic insensitive to build sites accessible by anything but chromium.

              Low key i wish this fires back into anarchy. I hate the corporate web and the only sites i like to see are those free of economic insensitive and all in on an ethical free digital world.

        • @GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 hours ago

          try changing your user-agent to mock chrome in Firefox while you visit YouTube.

          you should see a drastic difference in UX.

          • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 hours ago

            I tried YouTube in Chrome on desktop (for about 2 minutes) and I didn’t notice any difference. I’ll just keep using NewPipe on my phone though.

            • @GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 hours ago

              it takes a whole 10 extra seconds for the interface to be usable for me in Firefox. but not when I spoof the user-agent as chrome.

              at least that’s how it was about 4 months ago.

          • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 hours ago

            NewPipe exclusively. YouTube has been unusable long before I fully moved back to FireFox.

    • @ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 hours ago

      times of website incompatibility are long gone

      I wish I could agree with that. Hell, I have to use Chrome to download my phone bill from Virgin, and a couple of others don’t work.

      And don’t get me wrong, I’m not blaming FF. It’s these lazy web developers that only target Chrome. I’m sure Safari users get the same shit experience.

      • Kokesh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 hours ago

        I’ve cried also in dev a lot in the past, but mostly don’t cry so much anymore

    • @Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      some people dont want firefox bcs its kinda slower then chromium based tbh but it aint bad am not saying firefox is bad

    • lazynooblet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 hours ago

      I really wish Firefox implemented easily switchable browser profiles. I am use Firefox mainly but for work I’ll still use edge so I can use this feature.

      • @cschreib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know exactly what part of a separate profile you are after, so this may not be a 100% substitute, but I found container tabs in Firefox to work quite well (with some extensions to improve UX). It’s still the same profile though, so passwords and history are shared.

  • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    227 hours ago

    Hopefully wikipedia recognizes this as the official Canary in the Chrome mine. I was first impressed with chrome book because of seeing them used for education, getting my own laptop during school would’ve been mindblowing to kid me. I was unimpressed with the strangulation process of the OS but again shocked when they added a linux boot mode. There needs to be better alternatives by now, I would be ok with an OS developed by the department of education in conjunction with higher educational institutions. Could have a decent non-profit approach to a browser and ad blockers could legitimately be built in as a “protect the children” aim of approach.

    • @hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 hours ago

      I take it you’ve never been involved in such an endeavor? What you propose would take a decade a minimum due to the sheer number of nested advisory committees that would be required for those groups to interface. Better a non-profit group begins the work and then solicits these group’s input at the design stage.

  • ObliviousEnlightenment
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    Can we get a fork orba dedicated browser that stays on manifest v2? Even Firefoxs lack of plans is disconcerting. I want expmicit plans to not play along

  • @nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    739 hours ago

    We’ve known this was coming for a while now . . . but I suppose not everyone reads tech news.

    • @ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7311 hours ago

      Careful, there are some edgy people out there who don’t want to use more than one browser because Firefox doesn’t work with their cameras /s

      Meanwhile, I’ll still be using Firefox too

        • @JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 hours ago

          I do this with Discord and Zoom as an alternative to installing their actual apps. 99% of the functionality is there anyway, and the 1% is stuff I don’t want anyway

        • @thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          228 hours ago

          People who have to use their browser for telehealth and virtual teller banking access.

          Sadly these are also things that require better security.

          • Cadeillac
            link
            fedilink
            English
            58 hours ago

            Yup. Firefox doesn’t work for me unfortunately, so I have to maintain Chrome on at least one device for these things

            • Optional
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 hours ago

              Hey, member when you always had to have IE for one of “those” sites and it was basically just an awful browser everyone was forced to have like as a legal requirement or something?

              Heh. IE. Then when you’d use it to download firefox it’d say “Nooooo! Wait! I’m teh Best Browser!!” Hahahahah

              IE. Ded.

        • @ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4210 hours ago

          May be bad phrasing, but Firefox doesn’t support h.265 so there’s limitations with streaming video on some camera platforms and other sites.

        • @Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 hours ago

          I use MS teams for meetings every day at work, in Firefox, in Linux. It’s nice that even the camera works when I need it to.

        • @QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          People who use Webex, zoom, etc for one use in try browser and don’t normally use those links. Happens at work when an outside vendor doesn’t use what we do.

        • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 hours ago

          It’s so frustratingly annoying. I primarily use Firefox, but switch to Chrome for specific Google services on my mobile. Once in a while, the search suggests I take a photo? Why?

  • @rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5911 hours ago

    I used to recommend uBlock as a no-brainer, now folks really need to change towards a better browser.

    • @QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2810 hours ago

      Or get network wide blocking. Doesn’t prevent everything but it does prevent most ads. Makes the internet tolerable at least.

      • qprimed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4910 hours ago

        nah, lets get them switched away from chromium based spy machines.

              • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                66 hours ago

                Wouldn’t a company VPN bypass all that even though you are using your own internet connection to connect to the outside world?

                • @kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  24 hours ago

                  Maybe, I guess I don’t know enough to answer that. I do know that being on a company VPN isn’t always a requirement, though.

                  Either way, I’m not trying to argue for one approach to ad blocking over another as a one-size-fits-all solution, I just wanted to point out that it’s possible to have more control over the network than the computer in some cases.

          • qprimed
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            sadly, agreed. mindshare leads to adoption, tho - so putting Firefox in front of more faces is always a positive. after all, its how google dominates.

          • @shininghero@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            79 hours ago

            Depends on how lax the IT department is when it comes to random executables. I was able to move the firefox installer to the appdata root, and run a non-admin install to my user profile.

      • @abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 hours ago

        I recommended pihole to my senior webdeveloper. She didn’t know about it and was blown away by the concept. She installed it immediately and is now living happily ad free.

      • @rickdg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 hours ago

        Something like NextDNS as a no-brainer? It works but hits the limit of the free tier if people use it beyond their phone.

        • nfh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 hours ago

          PiHole and a TailScale exit node so you can use it for DNS whether or not you’re on your home network.

          • @Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 hours ago

            Or a variation of this is TailScale configured to use NextDNS and a TS exit node. That’s for anyone who doesn’t want to maintain a PiHole. I’ve done both. Personal choice.

    • @deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      479 hours ago

      Yes. There’s only 3 major browsers. Chromium (Chrome), Firefox, WebKit (Safari). Nearly every other webbrowser is a fork of one of these, most are forks of Chromium, including Opera. As such, most webbrowsers will be affected by the change.

        • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Chrome browser = chromium plus Google

          Samsung browser = chromium plus garbage

          Brave browser = chromium plus crypto and homophobia

          • @Mwa@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 hours ago

            Brave browser = chromium plus crypto and homophobia

            the crypto stuff can be opt out tho

            • @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 hours ago

              I don’t think it should’ve been opt-out, but Mozilla’s ad metrics development is very much the direction ads on the web should go in. It is impossible to determine who you are from the data. It’s a way to still have ad revenue funding the content we all consume, while also still maintaining privacy. It’s a good thing. It’s just the opt-out aspect for existing installs that’s bad.

              That said, I’m personally a proponent of just using adblock lol

              • TerkErJerbs
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 hours ago

                I also use adblocking at multiple levels so it wasn’t a huge thing for me (been blocking Pocket and other bullshit for years at the dns and network levels) but I still feel like Mozilla witnessed Google going for broke with killing mv2 and inline ads on YouTube and decided wellll our existing users probably wouldn’t notice or care if we slipped in an opt-out fuckery… But we did. Immediately.

                For any browser trying to sell itself as “the only privacy browser on the market” this was a dumb fucking move by any metric. Like why not just openly admit we’re going with the Brave browser model?

              • TerkErJerbs
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 hours ago

                No it’s not. But if we’re hoping Firefox will be better in some way we’d expect more from them. Wouldn’t we?

        • @deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          106 hours ago

          DuckDuckGo’s webbrowser is somewhat unique, in the sense that it isn’t its own browser at all. It’s a “WebView”, using the OS built-in webbrowser with a coat of paint.

          This means it’s Blink/Chromium on Android and Windows, and WebKit on iOS and macOS.

        • Chloé 🥕
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          depends on the OS!

          DuckDuckGo uses the default rendering engine of whatever OS you use it on, so webkit (also used by safari) on macOS and iOS and blink (also used by edge and chrome) on windows and android

          even if it uses the same rendering engine on some platforms, it’s not based on chromium, so it’s not a chromium browser

      • Chloé 🥕
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 hours ago

        what does the browser being Chinese have to do with anything?

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          02 hours ago

          You really don’t see a problem installing software from an authoritarian regime that spies on basically everyone and everything and has 0 privacy protection?

          • Chloé 🥕
            link
            fedilink
            English
            241 minutes ago

            the chinese government isn’t making every software that’s made in china lol

            like yea, opera is spyware, but so are chrome, safari and edge, and none of these are made in china

    • Engywuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 hours ago

      Not this with built-in adblockers, despite someone’s wishes.

  • @Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    06 hours ago

    I’m being downvoted heavily on Reddit for suggesting thorium instead of Chrome.

    My guess is bots as thorium is way faster and the dev hates the thought of a chromium browser without Adblock.

    Moronically I think the Reddit hive mind is following that opinion and I may have to delete the comment or face site wide blacklisting which is what usually happens.

    • Blaster M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 hours ago

      Thorium doesn’t support secure streaming, so while it was amazeballs fast, it wasn’t useful. Ended up picking Vivaldi for watching streaming.

    • @Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 hours ago

      tbh i dont like thoriums update cycle you stay on 1 version for 4 months the firefox fork is even worse thats why i use ungoogled chromium instead

      • @Teknikal@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        47 minutes ago

        Kinda agree it should have an update built in, I’m using Chris Titas/Titus update script to update it.

        Which to be honest doesn’t seem to update it much.

        I’m mostly basing my use on it being quite fast and the dev cursing out Google and swearing to keep Ublock.

      • @Teknikal@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        First I’ve heard of it honestly, I’m in the weird position I don’t really trust Google or Mozilla so all I’m using is forks.

        If those go ad crazy I’m kinda screwed.

        • @Teknikal@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          I’ll take your word for it but between all the nonsense Google and Mozilla have pulled I’m not sure where to place my belief.

          I’m sticking to thorium for now because it’s fast and does what I want in a browser