I’d like to see just how horrible someone can make a site. Facebook is a good contender.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Publisher’s Clearing House.

    So this company has ads on local free tv stations in the US about how you could win $5000 a week for life, but when you go to the website it’s like 97% ads and maybe 2% contests, and some contests are straight up unenterable if you have an adblocker. Then before you can officially enter, you have to go through 3 pages of ‘as seen on tv’ crap that it tries to sell you before you can finish entering. Also it lags like a motherfucker with or without an adblocker, cause there’s so many ads taking up that much bandwith, cause heaven forbid a webpage ad be a static image. And of course you have to have an account, so your spam folder and paper mailbox fill up with the worst things possible.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s hard to pick out one as THE worst, but generally, if I have to use the site for some external reason, the experience is awful.

    Health insurance, doctor’s offices, etc are generally pretty bad. Oddly, tax sites aren’t as rough.

    Also oddly, vacation related websites are awful.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    literally any restaurant website. I disabled Facebook from my entire network (pihole).

    I can no longer order food on a website because Facebook is deadzoned.

    Also, about half of big box brick and mortar online stores stopped working as well.

  • GhostTheToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Spotify. Only website/service that makes their service intentionally worst and people still pay for it

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Seemingly every recipe website. They tell a long, unrelated story, cover the page with ads, popups, slideouts, timer triggered ads, videos, etc.

    It’s almost impossible to see the recipe under all the crap.

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      These were some of the first sites to be enshittified. The more you scroll that more ad revenue they got. So they hid the actual recipes and steps under a back story longer than the dune books that forced you to scroll and hit ad after ad.

  • pearsaltchocolatebar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    16 hours ago

    4chan. When I saw a German shepherd get hit in the face with a shovel full force, I decided the site wasn’t for me.

    • anothermember@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The only way I’ve worked out how to even save Instagram images locally is using the page information (ctrl+i) Media tab in Firefox and sort through it to find it there. Terrible for an image hosting website.

      • hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s not an image hosting site, it’s a social media site whose goal is to keep you coming back for more. The easier it is for you to save their content locally, the less likely you are to spend as much time on their site.

        • anothermember@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          And the fact that people flock there despite that is a way I feel more and more distant from humanity…

          • hogmomma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            If you’re running Windows, though, you can use the Snipping Tool to grab the part of the screen you want to save, which may or may not have an image in it.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Pintrest is the worst website ever built and has caused immense damage to the free sharing of information.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Reddit.

    Fragile Mods. Shitty trolls. Dishonest engagements. Little to no good discussion. Opinions are seen as attacks. Power-tripping users and mods alike. Karma whores.

    • Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Can’t stand the staleness. Apart from the frigging bots and automods, it feels like a bunch of boring, shallow, sated establishment guys that like “pretending that one could be hip with a mortgage payment,” as Bela Koe-Krompecher once put it.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Just less users, making the bots more visible. You’ve had repost bots all through, we just assumed it was actual people trying to score cheap karma.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Ogrish.

    Doesn’t exist any more, but definitely traumatized me as a child.

    If you haven’t heard of it, it was basically a video hosting site focusing on extreme violence and gore.

    Tons of clips of people being killed or horrifically maimed in war, car accidents, industrial accidents, ‘extreme’ magic shows gone wrong, brutal gang attacks, straight up snuff videos…

    Some videos off the top of my head I won’t ever be able to erase from my memory:

    The beheading of Daniel Pearl.

    Low resolution video of 9/11, but you could make out people jumping from the towers… and splattering all over the ground. The camera man tracked people the entire distance they fell.

    Some insane magic show gone wrong where a man chain sawed his wife in half … she hadn’t managed to fold herself into the right position inside the magic box… her screams and twitching legs were not an act.

    A video taken in Fallujah (I think?) of an Iraqi hopped up on an absurd amount of drugs, taken from a US soldier who had just dismounted with most of his squad from a humvee.

    Him and others advance down the middle of a street towards the soldiers, all holding AKs. A volley of fire from the dismounted soildiers either took out all the group, leaving them with chunks blown off, writhing in agony, or scattering…

    Except this one guy. He’s clearly seriously wounded, but is still advancing basically blind firing his AK.

    The US soldiers are in shock that he’s still walking.

    Now for a burst from a 50 cal.

    Huge parts of this guy’s body are visibly blown off of him, but he still advances.

    A second, more sustained 50 cal burst basically liquifies him where he stood.

    • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That and rotten.com have been responsible for a lot of my insomnia, and probably a good chunk of my misanthropy.

      You can’t unsee things, folks. Don’t give in to the temptation. It’s not worth it.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        rotten.com actually was a protest website that was supposed to be the last bastion of online freedom of speech.

        it was a fucking eyesore for Gore and mistress Tipper.

        Remember–when they go low and refuse to let you go high, fucking bury them.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Ehhh I was on stile, ogrish, rottten very young, then /b/ when it first came out, then WPD, eyeblech, NSFW__, etc and I’m doing great. Some folks handle things differently… I’ve seen worse stuff than any of those sites and while it was horrible stuff, I’m aite

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Sometimes I think back to the shit we saw, and I’m a little amazed so many of us came out so well.

          And then elections happen, and well…

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I also came out fine even if I saw those horrible videos. But it’s a bit sad that it’s so hard to find those kind of websites nowadays. Social media just censors everything.

          I miss the good old wild west of the internet.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I thought Twitter was a stupid idea when it first started. 140 character limit? What the fuck is the point? The fact they increased that limit shows it was dumb. Everything else about the site just gives further reason to hate it.

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That limit came from the days of SMS. The idea was that you can’t go to the internet, because data is expensive, the network doesn’t exist, your dumb phone can’t even open websites etc. However, you can send SMS messages, and those things have a 160 character limit.

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Do does that mean they took an existing limitation from the SMS protocol, that didn’t apply because it used data instead and then shoehorned it into a godawful web 2.0 monstrosity all the same (and bear in mind, this is significantly reducing the unnecessary character limit!)

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 hours ago

          In 2006 the restriction did apply. The idea was that you would type the message on a computer, and let Twitter send a few SMS messages to a small group people.

          You weren’t supposed to have millions of followers or write a full length blog post using a hundred short messages. The idea was that you cold reach people quickly even though they didn’t have access to a proper computer or the internet. So much has changed in the past 18 years…

            • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Back in the bad old days, messages cost you real world money. If you wanted to reach lots of people by SMS, it would be pretty expensive. Might as well let Twitter pay for the messages, especially when you’re just writing a public announcement.

                • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I’ve heard some strange stories about a mysterious land on the other side of a vast ocean. In this far-away land of countless wonders, companies are only symbolically restricted by laws. This means that they can legally exploit their employees and customers in all sorts of creative ways, and charge pretty much whatever they want. Maybe you’ve heard similar wonderful tales as well?