• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    227
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really hope Europe is going to give them the support they need to see this through.

        • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          87
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Doubtful. They’ve shown beyond a reasonable doubt that nothing matters to them except blind loyalty to T. Nothing. Their own lives are meaningless before him, and his whims define their every breath. If he started shipping troops and guns to Russia, Republicans would be right there, fervently cheering him on.

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            The true believers REALLY don’t want American intervention and the “old guard” have already pushed back against supporting Russia multiple times.

            They’re feckless but they’re not of the same mind on this.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Except the old guard is literally being purged out of agencies right now and is almost completely gone from the national political scene. McCain is dead with trump dancing on his grave, Romney is out after voting to convict trump during the 2021 impeachment. McConnell is retired, but literally spent the last decade trying to get trump elected and give him complete control over the courts (and tried to hand the courts to partisan unqualified judges for 30 years) All of the other “old guard” have bent the knee or left.

              • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                While I agree, their margins are too thin the house and the senate hasn’t totally gone MAGA yet. They need more buffer seats and upcoming midterms are very favorable to democrats

            • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              22 hours ago

              But they’ll also toe the party line, no matter what that line is or who’s drawing it. I’ve known enough “I’m a Republican. I vote for the nominee” conservatives in my life to know that.

              • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                You can actually look at how Russia/Ukraine has been handled and see that that is factually incorrect. Look at the votes. Senate Republicans in particular have had no problem voting to send aid

          • rational_lib@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I have some hope from the fact that when they showed just how absurdly subservient they are, some people showed up at town hall meetings to yell at them. Not all of these representatives are totally insulated in a maga-encrusted bubble, and at some point the fear of being too pro-Trump might start to compete with the fear of not being pro-Trump enough.

            • Dogiedog64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Unfortunately, if the last 10 years have shown me anything, it’s that the Venn Diagram of Trump Supporting Fascists and Self-proclaimed Republicans is rapidly approaching a circle. Some may yet shock us by breaking rank now, but I have no doubt they’ll eventually fall in line, save for a show of deadly force causing them to knee-jerk rebel.

              Also, there will not be a point where they stop and say “Are we too Pro-Trump???” That’s just not how fascist regimes work. They encourage the self-cannibalizing behavior of reinforcing ever-deepening faith in The Leader/Party, leaving no room for thought or doubt as they demand ever-more-extreme shows of loyalty. Anyone who breaks the trend is an outsider to be immediately put down to enforce said loyalty further. Republicans have been showcasing this kind of behavior for years, such as adopting the term RINO (Republican In Name Only) for members who break rank, the constant buzzwords, hate speech, and battle cries cycled endlessly through their social circles to signify that they’re in the “In-Group”, the mountains of merch they all seem to own (hats, flags, truck stickers, etc.) to show support for The Leader, and most importantly, their propensity to IMMEDIATELY resort to violence when their Party/Leader/“”“authority”“” is questioned or denied. These dipshits are only gonna keep getting worse until Trump FINALLY bites it, and the cult of personality collapses, but even then, they might devolve further just to spite “”“The Left™️”“”.

              Argh.

        • payhn@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          52 minutes ago

          They’ve always been upset about George Soros but praise Trump letting Elon into every facet of the government to fix the budget. I can see the budget as a civilian but Elon needs access to my IRS and Treasury department info for “reasons”. Claiming he’s trying to fix the budget by selling old weapons to Russia would go over just fine for republican constituents. A lot of them don’t have any reason to see Russia as an enemy and many I’ve talked to like Russian culture a lot 🤷‍♂️ they don’t need a good reason to go with whatever leadership wants and making the libs upset is a pretty great reason for them if it doesn’t immediately affect them negatively

          • Welt@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            *facet, lol, but I wouldn’t put it past him!

            Let that dink in!

        • Railing5132@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          The current iteration of the GOP in the senate and congress resembles that of a drying jellyfish on a beach: spineless and worthless (no disrespect to actual dying jellyfish on the beach, who serve admirably in the food chain) . They will do whatever the fuck their god emperor tells them to do.

          They confirmed RFK Jr. for fuck’s sake.

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            As I said in another comment, Russia is a very specific issue. You can look at the votes on funding, they tell a pretty clear story. The senate in particular has had no issue pushing through funding for Ukraine

          • payhn@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That’s the next goal for the GOP. They already moan about how we pay more in military spending than other members, leaving NATO would be something good in their eyes. Ripping up NATO wouldn’t be a bad thing to them, just another way to stick it to the “European socialists libs”

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be honest, with the massive gains they’re showing, it would literally just be a continuation of what European allies are already providing. The only thing the EU, Germany and the UK need to do is continue the support already in place. Slava Ukraini

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Firstly, that’s not certain at all, yet. Secondly “spoiler alert” goes first, you don’t write the spoiler then the alert, your inability to understand that says no one should trust anything you say.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Ukraine is their neignbor. Being that most of Europe are also NATO members, It makes more sense to me that they be the ones to spearhead this proxy war if anyone should.

      • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Russia is all of our problem. Being that the US is part of the world and Russia is a rogue state with a nuclear arsenal and the flagrant aggressor, it makes plenty of sense for us to invest in reducing their ability to cause these kinds of shockwaves every 7-10 years on the world stage.

        Have you forgotten the social and political unrest Russia has caused in our country? Are you unaware of the money and personnel they invest into destabilizing our country? Should that just go completely unanswered?

        Do you seriously think we should only concern ourselves with Mexico and Canada or something?

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          “Have you forgotten the social and political unrest Russia has caused in our country? Are you unaware of the money and personnel they invest into destabilizing our country? Should that just go completely unanswered?”

          you overestimate the influence russia previously had in our country while simultaneously underestimate the impact of americas history on my own fellow Americans as well as the rest of the world.

          Do you seriously think we don’t invest money and personnel in destabilizing russia?

          I also didn’t say to eliminate support, but we shouldn’t be leading this charge

          “Do you seriously think we should only concern ourselves with Mexico and Canada or something?”

          I seriously think we should do what our fellow NATO countries have been doing the past 8 decades and start focusing our attention on improving living conditions at home instead of constantly spending absurd amounts of money to perpetuate this infinitely growing war machine that claims to hold other countries to standards that it can’t even hold itself to.

              • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                You cared enough to start shit and defend Russia. If you didn’t care you would’ve read and moved on. Don’t play at that bullshit.

                • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  I never defended russia. quit makin’ shit up. also, unlike you bots, I have to sleep sometimes.

                  • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 hours ago

                    I respond half a day later and you call me a bot who doesn’t sleep, but you respond within like an hour and you’re a real boy lmao

                    Be better man. Have a good one, truly.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                Ah, yes. You clearly don’t care so much you typed out a response.

      • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        proxy war

        So you think Russia waged this war just to stick it to the West? To me it looks like a war of conquest - Russia invaded so they could take land.

        • coolusername@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Why are you even guessing? Every single representative of Russia including Putin gives long ass speeches about why this is happening. Also the US is hardcore plotting and funding terrorism against Russia. They have incidents every two weeks or so.

          • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Every single representative of Russia including Putin gives long ass speeches about why this is happening

            The same government that has lied about so many things that I have lost count

            Also the US is hardcore plotting and funding terrorism against Russia

            Evidence? Do you think the US plotted and funded the Crocus City Hall attack for instance?

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Also because Putin needed a war to shore up nationalist fervor and distract from his failures and corruption. A classic play that almost always works.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If it was only about conquest, there is countries like Kazachstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tschadjikistan that Russia could conquer easily and w.o. consequences from the West.

          The key strategic goal for Russia is to prevent NATO standing on their homeland doorsteps.

          For a good explanatiom see this talk by Prof. John Mearsheimer, who foresaw this war coming ten years ago already.

          https://youtube.com/watch?v=JrMiSQAGOS4&pp=ygULbWVhcnNoZWltZXI%3D

          • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            NATO has already been on Russia’s borders - the Baltics and Poland were already NATO members that bordered Russia.

            I think the invasion of Ukraine was indeed a conquest for land. John McCain over 10 years ago predicted that Putin wanted to grab a “land bridge” between mainland Russia and Crimea:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLAzeHnNgR8&t=58s

          • perestroika@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            My guess: it was Putin doubling down on his bet made in 2014, which in turn was triggerd by chance (protests over an EU accession treaty triggering a revolution in Ukraine) and opportunism.

            Putin seized Crimea from Ukraine in 2014 and his popularity ratings soared. He allowed the conflict to be frozen and undertook a campaign of military reforms, but Ukraine also undertook their own.

            He subsequently isolated himself to such degree that he was surrounded by yes-men, and they told him Ukraine could be conquered with 200 000 men (and “was about to collapse anyway”, etc). He thought it would be over in days and told them to get it done.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Now this is just a dim take. We are fighting a war via a proxy (Ukraine) by offering the financial, logistical, and weapon support. Hence, a Proxy War.

          • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            What’s dim is refusing to recognise that this war was started by Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, then increased their invasion in 2022. Ukraine asked the West for military help so the West provided military help.

            Maybe Ukraine should have been allowed to join NATO years ago when they asked, and then they might not have been invaded.

              • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Ukraine’s not a member of NATO

                Indeed. That’s why I said maybe Ukraine should have been allowed to join NATO years ago. That might have prevented this invasion.

                i never disputed who the primary aggressor was in this war

                So you think Russia invaded, but then the West used this as an opportunity to harm Russia. Maybe the West wasn’t interested in harming Russia for the sake of harming Russia. Maybe the West just wanted Russia to stop its invasion of Ukraine.

                • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Russia invaded and i think the west didn’t care until we were out of our other forever wars and we needed a new way to keep the military industrial complex afloat.

                  • SleafordMod@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Would you have preferred to see the West provide nothing to Ukraine and instead just watch Ukraine get taken over by Russia? Perhaps that would have resulted in fewer deaths, but who knows. Russian forces probably would have still killed a lot of Ukrainians, and they would have subjugated Ukrainians, and probably they would have still committed rape and other acts.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Nazi Germany was also Europe’s neighbour. I’m sure America would have fared well just completely ignoring it until all of Europe and Russia was under nazi control. Sometimes you need to involve yourself before a problem becomes too big.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          “Nazi Germany was also Europe’s neighbour. I’m sure America would have fared well just completely ignoring it until all of Europe and Russia was under nazi control. Sometimes you need to involve yourself before a problem becomes too big.”

          I’m not sure what kind of a analogy you’re trying to draw here since Russia was one of our Primary allies trying to stop Nazi Germany. Are you suggesting we form an alliance with Russia because people are suggesting I’m doing someones job for free right now and your out here trying to draw parallels to WWII as if we want to make friends with Russia.

          -I have to say multiple accounts are making a hell of a lot of suggestions that i’m wrong and providing no source of information to back themselvss up.

      • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You are calling this a proxy war between North Korea and USA. North Korea is more in USA’s area of interest than that of Europe’s.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The US fucking around geopolitically is what got us this mess. The US was eager to walk over Russian security interests, despite warnings this could escalate to a war. And now Trump has spoken the quiet part out loud, that for the US this war is mainly a business opportunity, no matter who wins it in the end.

        The US dropping out of supporting Ukraine should be met with sanctions and a ban of any US investment into Ukraine for thr next 100 years. Also all US owned assets needs to be seized like the Russian ones.

        Neither country should be allowed to make a single Penny from rebuilding in Ukraine.