• GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You want the balls to stay on the table, maximum power to break the balls up as much as possible is more friendly game strat anyway. If you’re playing to win keeping some degree of grouping can make things harder for your opponent if you don’t sink off the break, which isn’t something to rely on.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          You want the balls to stay on the table, maximum power to break the balls up as much as possible is more friendly game strat anyway.

          Well when you put it that way it’s obvious how trans players have an unfair advantage! We know all about breaking the balls.

  • Acute_Engles [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moooom I need a new xbox controller this one is trraaaaannnsss

    Shut the fuck up

    New rule: if your “sport” can’t manage skill divisions without worrying about genitals it’s gone. Your sport is fired. No more pool until you can figure out how to let everyone play. This goes for all the other sports too.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “The FEEEEMALE specimen famously doesn’t have the special male pool table muscles that men evolved to fight naturally occuring pool tables in the wild, that’s not sexist and transphobic, that’s just science.” smuglord

  • pillow [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    They argue that the involvement of [trans women] in ladies’ competitions is deeply unfair because they have a clear physical edge over [cis women] competitors.

    These advantages include possessing greater upper body strength enabling them to make a more powerful initial ‘break’ of the balls

    AyyyyyOC-big youre-laughing tony-cheer

    I made the actual data-laughing face irl I’m so brainbroken

  • NotErisma [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ‘I recently played a transgender player and I was destroyed when I lost.’

    Why do you have to veil your L around transphobia? Just admit you have a skill issue. Oh wait, I guess being the “star” of a game only racist boomers in dive bars play really inflates your ego.

  • iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Transphobia in sports cannot be meaningfully separated from white supremacy in sports. They use the same racist excuses against trans people, and the same transphobic excuses against black people (see: all the black athletes that get banned for not being feminine (read: white) enough). And the transphobes even have their own transgender pseudoscience they use as justification, much like their race science of last century.

  • Utter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biological males all spread their enormous beards across the table at the start of every game. They use them to jostle the balls around, scoring points when it isn’t even their turn. They wrap their long moustaches around her pool cue and yank her off balance whenever she takes a shot. They put their testicles on the table, painted to look like pool balls. Every single time.

    • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      you keep saying ‘women’ in this comment when referring to cis women, which is the main issue here - it’s not like trans women are winning and then secretly going ‘yes, another victory for men’, but rather it’s cis women who are not seeing trans women as part of the same team. So what if some trans women get socialised in such a way that they have an advantage in pool? The only reason this is an issue is if you fundamentally see a victory for trans women as a loss for cis women. The fact this is being shown as oppositional (and being played as such) is the major issue here - if a cis woman had gone through the same experiences, and had the same advantages, would she also be considered an unfair competitor?

        • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          if we’re going down that path, shouldn’t we separate anybody who has had a parent who played pool from people with parents who didn’t play? And then shouldn’t we separate those based on who owned a pool table at home from those who didn’t? At what point are we drawing the line, if ‘might have had a Dad who pressured them into sports’ is an acceptable metric? Not to mention that basing your opinion on ‘tropes’ is how this discussion was started - people who’s only experience is seeing ‘Men In Dresses’ tropes on TV and then developing their opinions on trans people’s right to equal participation in society from that.

          • BountifulEggnog [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That is exactly my thoughts on the matter. There are many potential advantages some women will have over other women. Same with any other catagory of competitors, unless we just put everyone into an open category. But I don’t think that’s going to help the woman in the post.

            • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sorry you feel I’m being reductive, but that’s honestly how this is coming off. I’m not denying socialogical differences, and of course different lives lead to different outcomes - I am cautioning against painting every AMAB person with that brush as a way of excluding all of them from participation. Again, I’m asking you to be careful cos this is getting close to saying there are just unsolvable differences that can never be overcome, but ONLY when it comes to trans people.

                • Orannis62 [ze/hir]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We have data. The Olympics have been open to trans athletes for decades and trans women have simply not dominated. They’ve done disproportionately badly, actually. A trans swimmer won one (1) non-Olympic race last year and it caused a major media shitstorm, and that should be proof enough that it’s a rare occurrence.

                  Also just be careful with the “socialization” shit. And be careful assuming our experiences. Like re: the other part of this thread, I faced significant sexual harassment as an egg throughout high school. Because people might not have known my specific deal and god knows I didn’t, but people could tell something was going on with me. This is a common experience for eggs. There is no one “male socialization” for a number of reasons, but even within that wide range I really don’t feel I got it.

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyway, if you’ve grown up as a man, you’ve probably been allowed to pursue these male dominated sports pretty unhindered. Sure, you might’ve been an egg the whole time, but outwardly the men weren’t hostile to you, or creepy, or doubting.

      This erases the gendered harassment eggs face and is pretty offensive, comrade.

        • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          it’s not an on-off switch, and you would be surprised at the amount of people who pick up on ‘queer’ vibes before you yourself have picked up on it harass you accordingly

          • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I couldn’t say which is worse, having experienced neither and only witnessed the former, but my intuition is that there are significant differences in the way that creates a barrier, compared to what a cis woman might face. A big part of that is probably sexual harassment and such.

            • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think you have to be careful here - you have experienced neither but you have opinions on the lived experiences of the very people you are talking about, based on intuition. Not to come across as too toxic, but perhaps take a note from your username’s namesake and ask if you have investigated a problem, and whether therefore it is something you should be speculating so much on

                • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There’s not a lot else I can do to learn more but discuss it.

                  doubt

                  or rather, maybe read and consider the words people are writing before writing a defensive reply. some of the replies from trans users you’re getting are from people who have played 50 hours of sports in the last month much less their whole life.

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          My understanding

          is clearly quite poor when it comes to the experiences of trans people. maybe listen to us more and talk about us less.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      integration of sports was a mainstream feminist position back when that label actually meant something. now that we’ve just collectively accepted that women can never be equal to men, the only solution is individual striving and a narrow politics of representation.

    • CrimsonSage@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      This just seems like every just so story explanation for bigotry. Like just because you can come up with a story that sounds plausible doesn’t mean anything, unless you have data showing that trans women have some kind of statistical performance advantage over trans women then nothing else matters. And yeah ofcourse transphobes will come up with plausible stories that make them sound reasonable, few people are so self aware that they are just bigoted because they are bigoted, oftentimes the person the have to most convince is themselves.

      • DaringDarek [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, a semi-uncharitable reading of your comment would just be “don’t have hobbies, or fun”.

        Why not devote your life to pool, or any other sport? Seems a lot less of a waste than, like, golf.

        • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          how? Golf and pool are at the same level, not skills which apply to other areas, not useful to society, and not in this case creating community. Pool can be a hobby, but a complaint that anyone can’t make a living off of it is absurd.

          • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            One giant difference between pool and golf (I’m putting off work by posting to hexbear and now you have to suffer my nitpicking, I’m so sorry) is that golf is a massive waste of water and land, water and land that could be a dope ass park or wildlife preserve or literally anything other than a golf course. But pool is just an overly expensive (and heavy) table, a few balls, and a couple of sticks.

            Pool is way better than golf, is what I’m saying.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The experience you accumulated as a man will serve you well. It is experience afforded far less easily to women.

      Is this an actual valuable thing though? The “experience” here I mean. If there is one horrible thing perpetuated by that “10,000h makes you an expert” urban legend is that not only that was for music(piano) but one specific point is that bad practice will make you worse.

      Essentially you’ll never just bullshit around for 10,000 hours and become a world renowned expert, instead it only means through consistent and thoughtful practice, that is the ballpark time investment required.

      In any case if one wanted to talk about natural learning that is just the domain of children anyway, even teenagers and certainly any adult can’t just learn through just experience.

      So I don’t want to contest your comment entirely, but I want to make it clear its not that simple at all, shitty experiences and bad practice affords you no actual real advantage at all over someone that spent less time but more productive, focused time.

        • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Shitty practce is part of this scenario. Women get put in the women’s league with other women. As a cohort they aren’t paid as much, and the player pool is smaller, so the overall quality isn’t as high. Then they play against each other, and there you have it, 10k hours playing against people who aren’t posing the same challenges that a men’s league would. The experience isn’t even necessarily hours spent, it’s getting into the sport and staying with the sport in the first place, then playing against players who know all the tricks, and then learning how to counter them or play them yourself. On top of that, if your league gives out more money, then you can get professional mentor/coach.

          This makes sense yeah, I was thinking on the amateur literal bullshitter scenario though, person who plays pool once week for 2h isn’t “practicing”. But on the other hand if you’re at a point you’re committed to actualy playing and even join a league then yes its different I agree.

          At school I remember the boys could play a game of touch rugby (a bit like flag football) against the girls team, and pretty much walk past them using passing and schoolyard tricks. It wasn’t a strength or speed thing. It was that the boys had all been playing around with a rugby ball since they were 8 years old, while most of the girls had only started playing at the age of 15-16. The boys were essentially fluent in rugby. The girls could run all the training drills they wanted - drills can’t teach you the game psychology that thousands of hours of game time can. Even if they played every day, it could take them years to catch up. It’s different for pool as it’s arguably less nuanced than a team game, but still, comparisons can be made.

          Ok I’ll rephrase it, the specific reason I mentioned the 10k hour myth is this scenario:

          Person that thinks they’ll have an “advantage” learning to play piano as an adult because they had like 1 lesson a week for 2h during for a couple of years back in highschool or whatever. Unless you actualy reached a profficient level before that it is almost negligible or we can pretend it is. That versus an adult complete beginner age 25-35.

          The first person will have an advantage maybe for a the very basic stuff(again assuming the first person didn’t actually achieve anything, its why I said “BS around”) that takes maybe a few dozen hours to catch up, it would make no actual meaningful difference towards becoming a pro.

          The biggest sin of the 10k myth is bad practice e.g just repeating and playing the same song over and over. It wont make you better no matter how much you do it. Worse than that without an actual teacher we often just keep practicing bad habits and mistakes become even harder to fix compared to a complete beginner.

          This is what that 10k hour myth was all about. People in general tend to behave as if just “doing it” is good enough and end up making exaggerated goals and expectations, but also neglecting the need for real teachers and a real planned and effective practice method/schedule.

          Your example is a good point because there is no “wrong way” to play that game, everything they did was useful and a learning experience. This is not true for some other sports and definitely not true for a lot of hobbies etc. You can and most people indeed do spend a lot of time doing stuff that doesn’t improve their skill. I think a blanket statement of “I spent X hours doing Y before therefore I have an advantage” is possibly disingenuous without clarification, like what did you actually do with that time?

    • Babs [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is true but also the pool of trans women playing professional pool has got to be real real small, yeah? Are there any sports where trans women are overrepresented for their gender?

            • renata [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              well our winning is inevitable as the genius cis have pointed out given that all amab people receive olympic quality coaching and constant exhortations to athletic dominance from birth

              • Orannis62 [ze/hir]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m so glad that the cis arrived to tell me that my experience in men’s locker rooms was actually fostering my growth as an athlete and not in any way gender violence that would push people out of sports. I felt so coddled and supported in my athletic pursuits

                It must just be a coincidence that this Just Asking Questions shit in this thread leads to the same conclusion that virulent transphobes reach

                (Fr though this guy assured my that the sexual harassment I faced as an egg was definitely not as bad as a woman would face and I want him to fuck off and die)

  • renata [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    the cis woman ringer pool shark has been a sitcom trope for like 4000 years because it’s one of the few sports-related activities that doesn’t even have the pretense of biologically male skeletons. unless cis women are gonna start demanding that girlbrains be recognized as a disability like even for notoriously shortsighted reactionaries this kind of stuff is wild in its aimlessness.