Discuss Online
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Wilshire@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago

Iraq bans the word "homosexual" on all media platforms and offers an alternative

www.cbsnews.com

external-link
message-square
35
link
fedilink
179
external-link

Iraq bans the word "homosexual" on all media platforms and offers an alternative

www.cbsnews.com

Wilshire@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
35
link
fedilink
The decision was made to safeguard societal values and public order, the country's communications commission said.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 years ago

    …the terms “homosexuality, homosexual, and Gender” hold undesirable connotations within Iraqi society.

    Fellas, is it gay to have a gender?

    • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      With how many there are now, statistically, yes.

      • Reva@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

      • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Angry upvote

  • 8BitRoadTrip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 years ago

    They are directing that the term “sexual deviancy” be used instead.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 years ago

      Iraq and Florida should get a room. They’re made for each other.

      • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 years ago

        That sounds gay

        • xtapa@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          You mean sexually deviant?

        • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          Totally legal, and totally cool, and totally straight.

    • DudePluto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ew

    • Jimbo@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Who says I wasn’t doing sexual deviancy already?

  • megane-kun@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    Iraq’s Media and Communications Commission has issued a directive instructing all media and social media platforms in the country to refrain from using the terms “homosexual” or “homosexuality” and instead use “sexual deviancy.”

    The decision, reported widely by Iraq’s state and private news outlets, was made to safeguard societal values and public order, the commission said, noting that the terms “homosexuality, homosexual, and Gender” hold undesirable connotations within Iraqi society.

    What? They think calling someone a sexual deviant is better than calling someone a homosexual?

    I can’t even give them the leeway and say it’s just meant to say “you’re a minority.” They chose the word ‘deviant’ here: which implies there’s a ‘correct’ sex

    Maybe that’s the point though. You’re not allowed to be anything other than a straight male in Iraq.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s absolutely the point, they want to shame the gays into hiding. Later will come the executions if this doesn’t work

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      Your logical mistake is assuming this is meant to be an actual alternative. It’s them blatant saying gay people are unwelcome.

    • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Still better than “sexually retarded”

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think the correct term is “sexually challenged.”

        • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sexually deranged, maybe?

      • megane-kun@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Actually had a belly laugh at this one, thanks!

    • whinestone_cowboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is a “correct sex” according the the Little Pebble cult. It involves a lot of yogurt.

      • megane-kun@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I shouldn’t have looked it up.

        It’s far worse than what I imagined it to be, far far worse.

  • famousringo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    They’ve done it! They’ve defeated gayism!

  • Hobbes@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    So… “Don’t say gay”?

  • zepheriths@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Those to are not interchangeable. The terms homosexual and sexual deviant are 2 entirely different things one is a somewhat common form of attraction the other enjoys being shat on.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d argue that consenting adults can do what they want, the “deviants” are the ones trying to break the covenant of consent.

  • Gingerlegs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Usa: hold my beer!

    /s but how long until

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Florida already did this for their schools at least, the press is harder to silence in the us though

    • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      “FREEDOM OF SPEECH! No, not like that!”

      • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        You mean limited freedom of speech, right?

        Right?

        • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I wouldn’t say free, more like under new management.

  • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, I’m just surprised they didn’t do this sooner…

  • discostjohn@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    How do you guys feel about these clickbaity headlines?

    • Wilshire@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I assumed it’s because they didn’t want to put ‘sexual deviant’ in their headline.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fabulous?

  • Crisps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    How did the media communicate this? Seems like a catch 22!

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Religion of peace

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If your societal values and public order are that tenuous and fragile, then perhaps you’re focusing on the wrong problems.

Not The Onion@lemmy.world

nottheonion@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !nottheonion@lemmy.world

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 751 users / day
  • 3K users / week
  • 8.84K users / month
  • 19.2K users / 6 months
  • 62 local subscribers
  • 16.3K subscribers
  • 1.64K Posts
  • 62.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • kescusay@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org