• Plopp@lemmy.worldEnglish
    3332·
    10 months ago

    So, instead of getting the ability to search for videos properly, with negative search terms, user defined video length spans, exact dates, sort by reverse date order etc… we get ambient mode and color search? Can someone please, for the sake of humanity and my sanity, erase this company and its parent from the planet.

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1721·
      10 months ago

      Seriously, there was a time when Google was lauded for all kinds of awesome innovation, and joked about that you needed a PhD to even be a janitor there.

      Look at them now. They can’t even do basic search functionality anymore, and are so misguided that they put out color filters for video.

      I 100% agree they need to just stop existing at this point.

      • vexikron@lemmy.zipEnglish
        24·
        10 months ago

        Arent there like Ralph from the Simpsons originating jokes about how like, this crayon tastes like yellow?

        Congrats YouTube, thank you so much.

        I can now enjoy green flavored content, fuck having a working suggestion algorithm that actually recommends interesting content, I guess I can use YouTube for what it seems to be intended for these days, as an ambient noise and color generator for my monitor and room while i actually do something else.

    • FlumPHP@programming.devEnglish
      701·
      10 months ago

      The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

      In YouTube Music, when you’re building a tuner to create a station, you can’t search at all. Instead, you get an endless scroll off bands and have to find the one you want that way. The order is random.

      Like … Pandora let you do the same thing with search back in the 00’s

      • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
        61·
        10 months ago

        The fact that Google started as a search company and yet search in their own apps sucks is boggling.

        It’s not boggling; it’s very simple: they discovered that having shitty search apparently makes them more money than having good search.

        • vexikron@lemmy.zipEnglish
          19·
          10 months ago

          Bingo!

          Don’t Be Evil.

          It was obvious they would enshittify, they literally told us they would.

        • Plopp@lemmy.worldEnglish
          9·
          10 months ago

          I feel like maybe the term “search” when applied to digital services should be regulated. What Google et al do isn’t search, it’s recommendations. Recommendations can be useful, but they sure as hell don’t replace search. Someone call the EU.

          • Num10ck@lemmy.worldEnglish
            25·
            10 months ago

            if they won’t regulate what ‘news’ or ‘organic’ or ‘private’ means then good luck with ‘search’. waiting for the government to get wise and save us, still?

      • Plopp@lemmy.worldEnglish
        9·
        10 months ago

        You made me search the internet to rid me of my confusion! I’m all vermilion now!

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
      10·
      10 months ago

      I absolutely hate the ambient mode. I mean, I get it, it’s kind of my problem if I am trying to use ancient desktop, but it’s also pretty unnecessary.

      Trying to view YouTube videos on many school computers became a pain in the ass. Some are so laggy that I can’t even get to disable the ambient mode without which it would still be somewhat usable. (But hey, piped.video works.)
      Hell, even my HP 255 G7 (a fairly average office laptop with Ryzen 3 3200U) struggles with it. It gets laggy and turns into hairdryer.

      Secondly, it’s distracting.

    • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      101·
      10 months ago

      Yes it’s super weird that porn sites had that functionality for over a decade and one of the world’s largest tech companies still can’t implement those.

    • fidodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      This sounds like they made a cheap feature from data they already had, but didn’t stop to think why anyone would ever want it.

  • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
    127·
    10 months ago

    With all the absurd turns YouTube and Google have taken, I’ve been looking at this for five minutes trying to figure out if this is a shitpost

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.worldEnglish
    90·
    10 months ago

    Sounds like a new and inventive way for them to push sponsored content on you but make it seem like you had some choice in the matter

    • Plopp@lemmy.worldEnglish
      54·
      10 months ago

      You’ve searched for Red! Here are some funny, relaxing and interesting videos from Coca-Cola, Adobe and Target!

    • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      15·
      10 months ago

      I’m sure they’ll also share their information with “content creators” so they can all start using the most popular colors and the site can become even more generic and samey

  • AbsurdityAccelerator@lemmy.worldEnglish
    73·
    10 months ago

    There are millions of youtube videos uploaded every single day. Why do I always get the exact same stuff in my recommendations? And why does YouTube shorts keep playing the same clips over and over again? Even the ones I disliked.

      • Pechente@feddit.deEnglish
        11·
        10 months ago

        Oh man I needed this! Not the stupid extensions that play it in a normal YouTube window or something. I just wanna remove that crappy short form video stuff altogether.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
          5·
          10 months ago

          The UI for shorts is terrible. You can’t double click to fast forward, as that likes the video. Why are they inconsistent with their own player?

    • Boy of Soy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      131·
      10 months ago

      You should never dislike on YouTube. They just view it as engagement and will give it you more. To actually get rid of content that you don’t like, you need to use “not interested” in the context menu.

      This drove me crazy for a long time.

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      Because those videos give Google the best ad revenue. Who cares what the users watch all long as Google gets rich along the way.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzEnglish
          1·
          9 months ago

          Google gets more money if the video has more ads. Google also pays more in bandwidth and storage if the video is really long or high res. Also, advertisers don’t like drugs, violence or guns, whereas makeup and mobile phones are totally fine, so those videos are a suitable background for ads.

          All of these variables go into the calculation that determines the sweet spot for Google, and the search results are ranked accordingly. You may be looking for an hour long video essay on the torture methods seen in the Hellraiser movies, but Google really wants you to spend more time on 5-minute crafts instead. Actually, 30 s shorts would be even better, as long as they keep you preoccupied.

    • Advocado@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      10 months ago

      What? You don’t go to YT and think “hmm i wonder what color I’m in the mood for today”?

      Weirdo.

  • SloppyPuppy@lemmy.worldEnglish
    571·
    10 months ago

    Color is so stupid. Who the fuck cares what color the video is. Couldve used this to actual good like pick three minor subjects from the video and ask me if im interested in more of those. That would be awesome. And I know they have that data.

    • CluckN@lemmy.worldEnglish
      33·
      10 months ago

      Black History Month

      Separating videos based off of color.

      Never change Google.

    • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.caEnglish
      22·
      10 months ago

      Even easier, pick video lengths.

      <1min, 1-10min, 10-30min, 30-60min, 60min+.

      I’d use that all the time.

      • Madrigal@lemmy.worldEnglish
        101·
        9 months ago

        They used to have that as a filter. Although for a long while you could pick short (<4 mins) or long (>20 mins) but not medium length videos.

        This, too, was a sign they had no fucking idea what they were doing.

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.infoOPEnglish
      11·
      10 months ago

      This reminds of how Xiaomi introduced sorting by colours of the app icon in their launcher. But that was different and I believe actually helped getting around

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        11·
        10 months ago

        At least that would make for an aesthetically pleasing gradient for some people. Sorting videos by color makes no damn sense. I’m not in an orange sort of mood lmao

        • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
          4·
          10 months ago

          I don’t understand what that even means, most videos on are predominantly blue and green if they’re outside, and basically white if they’re inside.

          The only videos that will be red or purple are music videos.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        I have sorted the icons on my quicklaunch bar (on my desktop PC) by color. Those typically aren’t sorted in any particular order so putting them by color was something visually interesting to do. Their titles aren’t displayed here, it’s just the icons, and there’s 12 of them, so actually it does help guide my eye, if I know I’m looking for, the Blender logo my eye tends toward orange.

  • Thann@lemmy.mlEnglish
    491·
    10 months ago

    The recommendation algo is so bad they are testing it against a random bullshit generator…

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
      28·
      10 months ago

      I fucking hate the algorithm.

      I can watch 20 fucking hours of content about a subject, and it wont suggest anything similar.

      but I accidentally click a link someone posts to a crazy right wing video, I get nothing but right wing violence and brainwashing fear mongering videos for over a week that I can barely break the fuck out of with hyper specific searches.

      Which is the same problem facebook has, in that the algorithm favors right wing extremism and shoves people heavily down that path, and only through very significant and concerted effort can you break out of it.

          • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
            4·
            9 months ago

            And if I happen to click on those videos only to confirm it’s not for me they will be like “omg, he’s crazy about this video! Let’s recommend 10 different variations of this video from now on!”

    • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      5·
      9 months ago

      I’ve recently started getting the most random, low-view localised content from small channels even though I never watch anything in my native language or any content like what they are producing.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        My friend says the same thing. I would welcome the change honestly, Ive watched these videos already, Youtube, I will take anything new at this point.

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    513·
    10 months ago

    That is stupid. I wish it would just let me block channels for real in search. Also, I wonder how that works if you’re colorblind?

    If I want something news related, that doesn’t mean I want to see Fox News or other random right wing nutjobs who scream into the camera about “wokeism” every day for 4 hours.

    • micka190@lemmy.worldEnglish
      54·
      10 months ago

      Things I wish YouTube would let me do:

      • See dislikes
      • Disable Shorts (uBlock lets me filter them out, at least)
        • At the very least let me control the fucking volume on Shorts instead of muting/unmuting them only if you’re going to force them down my throat (seriously, it makes the entire video format unwatchable on Desktop because every fucking Short video is so god damned loud)
      • Disable holding left-click to fast-forward a video (I do this thing where I’m about to pause a video and hold down the click until they’re done talking and this change is just so fucking stupid, I don’t understand who needs to hold down left click to fast-forward)
      • Actually block channels I’m not interested in
      • Block videos based on keywords
      • Recommend videos based on the one I’m currently watching if my watch history is disabled
        • Seriously, since disabling it YouTube does nothing but recommend “trending” crap that has absolutely nothing to do with what I’m watching

      If they’d implement even half of that, my user experience would shoot up through the roof. But, you know, they couldn’t give a rat’s ass about user experience.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.caEnglish
        23·
        10 months ago

        I’d also like them to fix the search. It only returns a small handful of results and then the rest is just recommended stuff not relating to the search

      • paradiso@lemm.eeEnglish
        172·
        10 months ago

        I know it’s been said many times, but I truly miss the old internet. Fuck this homogeneous, corporatized, spyware ridden, ad infested, data harvesting, soulless, pile of fucking dogshit called the modern internet.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
          9·
          10 months ago

          With terrible UI on top. Like seriously YouTube let me hide videos after I’ve watched them.

          • Advocado@lemmy.worldEnglish
            8·
            9 months ago

            Not only that, let me hide whole dumbass channels. Then apply a similar function at Google search so I can spare my eyes from seeing a 1000 temu ads with each result.

            Just let my choose which sites I want to block from showing me search results and ads.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        9·
        10 months ago

        Add “autoplay the next episode of the podcast I’m watching if it’s available.” Yeah, youtube, I really wanna watch Well There’s Your Problem #138 immediately after Well There’s Your Problem #43. Idiot.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          9 months ago

          “Let’s Play Dumbcraft! Ep. 1”

          Then get every other Episode except Ep. 2 listed, so you have to go to the channel and manually find it…

      • Echo Dot@feddit.ukEnglish
        5·
        10 months ago

        Disable holding left-click to fast-forward a video

        Oh god yes I hate this so much. If I want to control the playback speed of video there is an option in the settings for that. If they wanted to make it an option to fast forward by doing something rather than just changing the setting globally, it would have been better if they had picked literally anything other than me having to keep my finger on the mouse button. It should have been if I hold down the right arrow key.

      • aPirate@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        Currently the set up that makes youtube somewhat tolerable for me is, Ublock Origin (obviously), sponsor block, Return youtube dislike, Youtube-shorts block , and UnHook. Another option would be to use invidous, Freetube, or NewPipe, but all of them are not perfect and have their own limitations.

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.infoOPEnglish
      81·
      10 months ago

      Also, I wonder how that works if you’re colorblind?

      This was probably a joke but I can actually answer that for you.

      First of all, afaik there is no scientific consensus that people see the colours the same way. In fact, we most likely don’t. The visual colour interpretation is mostly likely merely added on by our brains basing on the knowledge of wavelengths. In other words, there is no such thing as “absolute blue”. There is “a blue” which is the colour each one of us’ brains was taught to call blue by simply showing the sky. If I were to look through your brain (but not through your eyes, eyes understand wavelengths), we would probably disagree on each and every colour.

      Second of all, there are different kinds of colour blindness. It is in fact an umbrella term for different disabilities. My understanding is that they usually involve a spectrum between two hues. So most colourblind will simply be unable to tell a difference between objects of two colours: for example red and green. They see them as slightly different versions of the same colour. However it would be wrong to say that the person in question sees red as green or vice versa, because, again, there are no “absolute colours”. Their eyes cannot distinguish between these two ranges of wavelengths and the brain interprets them as the same colour.

      And finally, colourblind people, when diagnosed, are fully aware of being colourblind, and furthermore, they DO NOT see in black and white. Even if a person cannot distinguish red and orange, then they still are aware there is a difference that most people around can tell and that there are concepts and feelings associated with them.

      What I am trying to say is that a colour-blind person would probably still be able to, for example, associate “red” videos with action and blood, and “green” ones with nature and calmness, even though this distinction is not palpable to them.

      Either way, this filtering with thumbnail colour is fucking stupid.

      • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        4·
        10 months ago

        Very interesting - my job involves a lot of Excel and charts, so I recently took a training on how to make those more accessible for colorblind folks. So that’s good to know!

    • evatronic@lemm.eeEnglish
      4·
      10 months ago

      Also, I wonder how that works if you’re colorblind?

      It’s orange, blue, and yellow fyi.

  • bfg9k@lemmy.worldEnglish
    38·
    10 months ago

    Has anyone else noticed that if a video says ‘like and subscribe’ the subscribe button does a little animation to draw your eye to it?

    Really wish there was a better way to host videos that doesn’t require a multibillion dollar company’s backing

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
      25·
      10 months ago

      Really wish there was a better way to host videos that doesn’t require a multibillion dollar company’s backing

      Archive.org. For now. But people keep uploading full copyrighted movies to it and there appears to be no content moderation, so at some point there will be a massive lawsuit and it will be shut down. And that will be an incredibly sad day because it is currently also a source of useful public domain footage like the Prelinger Archives. Without the Internet Archive, we will not have a non-commercial archive of public domain footage.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
      102·
      10 months ago

      That was youtube, before it was sold.

      There will never be another one again. Storage, Bandwidth, Server, etc etc costs would be too astronomical for anyone but another multi-billion dollar company to spin up a competitor.

      There are small scale niche efforts, Like for guntubers, or that stupid members only floatplane thing, but none of them will ever compete with youtube, because they don’t have the scale or reach. and never will.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
          85·
          9 months ago

          and considering i’ve never heard about it until you just mentioned it, I guess that means its very not big and very not a youtube competitor.

          Also, a p2p video site will never work. cause you will just be offloading the bandwidth and storage burdens onto individuals who are far far less equipped to handle suhc things on their personal connections than a major video provider.

          • 31337@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            6·
            9 months ago

            I believe it works like Bittorent (and things like Windows updates) where there is a swarm of peers that simultaneously upload and download to/from eachother, so the original creator, or any single user, doesn’t necessarily need much bandwidth. There are some disadvantages to this, but it is manageable, and works for many other things. If it actually became a thing, I imagine sponsored/patreon-funded creators would pay someone to seed their videos to ensure availability and quality. Fans would probably help too. Technically, it’s a viable option.

            But yeah, with how walled-garden the Internet has become, it probably won’t become popular without massive amounts of marketing and doing things like signing exclusivity deals with popular creators, which needs a lot of money.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
              24·
              9 months ago

              Thats still going to get up petabytes of bandwidth at scale, and it will be sobs like you eating the cost of it. Which is why it’ll never work.

              Bandwidth is cheaper the bigger in bulk you buy it, which is pretty much the only reason youtube of today is viable at all… All your peer2peer idea does is the same thing that every business in America does… Socialize the costs and privatize the profits.

              It has been a long time since i’ve heard someone go crazy on the whole “p2p can fix anything/everything” spiel though. Its long since been overtaken by the whole “blockchain can fix anything/everything” spiel, so it was quite nostalgic hearing it again.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  34·
                  9 months ago

                  Not at all, if you are trying to serve a file to millions, if not billions, of simultaneous user downloads.

              • 31337@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
                1·
                9 months ago

                Thanks :) I’ve always been extremely pro-decentralization (that does not use blockchains to “solve” byzantine fault tolerance and sybil vulnerabilities). I’m fine with things being somewhat less efficient if they’re decentralized, and fine with creators and fans eating the costs about things they’re passionate about (though it would probably turn semi-decentralized with companies offering seeding/content-delivery services at low cost). The rise of symmetric home fiber connections further increases viability. But, I agree that it likely will never become mainstream.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  11·
                  9 months ago

                  everyone speaks boldly until they get a ISP bill for thousands, if not tens of thousands, of their local exchange equivalent of dollars.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.worldEnglish
    438·
    9 months ago

    Holy crap, the amount of hate in here, and no actual description of what it does. It’s essentially your normal home feed, but only the videos with thumbnails of the selected color. It’s also way over at the right of the home feed filters, so it isn’t like it’s being shoved down your throats.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.worldEnglish
          112·
          9 months ago

          I care because it shows YouTube is more interested in wasting resources on dumb, pointless features rather than fixing various problems that have been plaguing content creators over the years

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.worldEnglish
            43·
            9 months ago

            The resources used to implement this aren’t the same as the ones that would be used to address some of the other issues, as the ones I know of are more social/legal ones.

            I bet this was mostly done by a single coder who showed it off and management thought it was a fun thing so added it to the main site.

          • Joelk111@lemmy.worldEnglish
            22·
            9 months ago

            At this point I feel like it’s intentional, and either way, am not surprised. Unlike a lot of other commentors here, I don’t see the point in wasting mental power on worrying about it.

    • Jknaraa@lemmy.mlEnglish
      113·
      9 months ago

      Yea, seems like a fun and quirky feature, but unfortunately I don’t think there’s anything big tech companies can do at this point to turn things around with public opinion given how utterly egregious their other sins have been (and continue to be).

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
        181·
        9 months ago

        Fun quirky features are things you make when you have a good product.

        These types of features added to things with genuine ongoing problems will always piss off users.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        Most people love YouTube, I know it doesn’t feel like it when you’re inside the Lemmy bubble but the big tech companies are far more popular than anything we like

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nuEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          I love the videos on it, and fist off I liked the site too, but they have been enshittifying it pretty hard lately

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
    362·
    10 months ago

    Probably another method of gathering user data for their AI training models.

    I no longer think that big media corporations are doing stupid things for no reason because they’re dumb

    I think they do stupid things because they want another way to train their dumb AI and we’re all too dumb, mindless and powerless to say or do anything about it all.

    It’s crazy when you think about it … humanity is degrading itself from all corners just to raise an idiot AI child that will be just as messed up as we are.

  • Mango@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    9 months ago

    Can I get a feed that’s not insisting that I watch the same small selection of garbage for months? Thanks.

    • Mammothmothman@lemmy.caEnglish
      7·
      9 months ago

      Or the videos you watched years ago and still remember. There is more youtube video than my lifetime why the hell would i watch the same shit over and over again?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      Disable your viewing history. I don’t go on YouTube deep dives like I used to, but at least my suggested videos aren’t all related to some previous dive I’ve done anymore.

    • Minotaur@lemm.eeEnglish
      31·
      9 months ago

      The “not interested” button is your hero. Really, just hit “not interested” on a few of the offending genre and it should get right out of there.

      If you also remove them from your history - even better

  • Minotaur@lemm.eeEnglish
    284·
    9 months ago

    I just used it and I thought it was kind of cute. It’s obviously “useless”, but as a small (I assume temporary) change I thought it was interesting to see how different “genres” of videos tend to color code themselves in the thumbnail.

    I’m all for small, fun little things in websites. Like anytime google has an interactive daily theme